◆ SpookStack

-10- . without the best and most modern help, or he. vill’ suffer a nerveous breakiown. : oe Here the end of a long critique written in 1925 ana welle known Swiss paper: Technik und Industrie und Schweizer Chemiker Zeitung, concerning my book "Richtiges Denken in der Berufsarbeit und sein Geschéftswert" /Right Thnking in the professional Work end its Value for the Business/: "Like a recd thread the knowledge extends throughout the whole book that one can consider in the la:t the whole modern economy ot.ly as a means to lead mankind to s hi:her cultural plat- form to an universal opinion that not this one is the strongest who reaches the hi_hest material success, th: best guns and most peisonous 2as but thst one who has won the bi:hest step of humenity!" Casider thet was written in 1925!! Today we notice the awakening and uprising of the people in the last, in India and Chine, short in all the five continents! It is the result of the two world-wars, when they saw the white men fighting and destroying each other. They possess a very old culture and much wisdom, while we have only civilisation and human intellect. that is more valuable, seen from 3 higher ;latform? Have we anymore culture??. The late count Hermann Keyserling, + lOG, a European wise men ard ;hiloso;her, said: "With the spirit scross the matter," That means we must bring svirit in all the materiel channels, Life cust become the hi,hest art and technics. We kave to learn that God is Divine Law, the Sviritual Prin igizle, in, around and ebove nature and man. He is not a person, but the creative power, life beings active everywhere. We learn that ell threuc gh Spi: itual Sciences wen may kill end destroy millions anc ~illions, etill the po> puiation of the world is erowing every ye 1 re_ularly like an alarn- clock. Now we have 2200 millierds of men, Behind the visible material world and facts there is the invisible s iyitual reality which sets the material world coing end keeps it so. God is unchangeable. He is eternal quitness but-the human beings, Tis tools and expressions, don't resemble Fim. They are alwoys chanjing end in a hurry. But why? Nobody can tell u&; perha; because the other fool ig-in: hurry. Ofcourse the mechanic sczéentist says that is all hy, othetical. Well it seems to me that the only practio:l result from the past