Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Henry a Wallace — Part 3
Page 61
61 / 100
She stated she was somewhat fearful this might become.an jasue
and wondered tf we woulG not check further because information
had been given to the Committee indicating that we did have this
information alleging that Wallace had contacted a suspected
sve report from Sourwine that we had nothing on this incident.
ujet agent tn Philadel phia; that this suspected agent had
requested information on the atom bombg Wallace declined to
furnish information: stating he had furnished 235, and that
was enough. She further stated this same agent was supposed
to have rather conststently been with Wallace and was with
Wallace in Miant, prior to the Philadelphia meeting ,sometine in
1941 or 1942. 4
I_told her we still had not been able to identify an
inctdent such as described. e then aske ere were any
incidents involving contacts with suspected agents. _I asked
her_if her source.ofinformation was_originally connected with
the old Manhattan Engineers District. She stated frankly she —
did not know but doubted tt. hen asked tf the name of a
promtneni—Pntindel pais arganizer meont anything. J told her
I_could not follow her on thise JI asked her if she could not
Please try to get more identifying details if we are supposed
to have the informatien so we can check and double-check.
antime tt is suggested the Security Division
Miss Adans subsequently called back and said that she
had talked to the Senator and he told her to tell me the -
alleged conversation between Wallace and thé suspected subverst ve
agent came
rom _"a telephone conversation.” - d Miss Adams
rtain than ever that some other agency had
eal Shehad no. further information but ts trying to
Oy get further..tnformation.and.told ma confidentially that she
wants us tobe. absolutely certain that. we do not have jt
because of repres antations which have been. made..to the, Senator.
I told her if tt did come from a tap.we. could not
urnish the tnformatton because this would be a vutolation of
the law. She stated if we did have if, however, we could indicate
Comething about the incident. I told her would have te wat and
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic