◆ SpookStack

Declassified Document Archive & Reader
Log In Register
Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.

Henry a Wallace — Part 1

228 pages · May 10, 2026 · Document date: Sep 1, 1933 · Broad topic: Politics & Activism · Topic: Henry a Wallace · 227 pages OCR'd
← Back to feed
30 the only party to feel the blow. The US Government was then in the thide of its own anti-trust suit against the in- dustry, and regarded the Goldman case as a testing ground for its own cam- paign. The t of Justice hus- tled into the fray, and a brief was filed on behalf of the government as “amicus curiae,” claiming that the public had a direct interest in the number of first- run theatres, that it was to the public's benefit to have as many as possible, and’ that “the District Court’s approval of the pattern of distribution disclosed... is a threat to free competition in any business.” On August 2, 1945, the Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the District Court. After a long delay, the final judgment was delivered and Goldman was awarded $375,000, about a quarter of his original request, on last December 19. Eleven ~ HOW THE FILM DISTRIBUTION. MONOPOLY WORKS = ihe eo. el | L@sirerausth BEES BBEL initial showing i city ‘restricted to ons theatre controlled by hig firms First-ron house plays picture as fong as @ is profitabis f hestal fea & admission price Set by big distributor | KEY ARUN -QHCATRE ! eS NEW REPUBLIC days later he sued again, this time for $8.4 million for profits lost at the Er- langer between the time his first suit started and the end of 1946. The de- fendants appealed the original suit back to the Circuit Court. But the battle was won. Six months before the award, how- ever, the attention of theatre people everpwhere-was drawn a cision rendered in the crucial “New _ York Case” of the government against the industry. This judgment finally out- lawed any kind of block booking; for- bade chain contracts for any pictures; barred price fixing; opened the picture market to free competitive bidding; and forbade the acquisition of new theatres by any of the producer affiliates. The basic threat to freedom in the ine dustry—producer-owned theatre chains —has not been scotched. But the gov- ernment is carrying the case to the Su- preme Court with a request for com plete divorcement. A final decision will probably be rendered sometime next winter. Anybody’s guess . s this is being written, the Supreme Coust is considering 2 motion to stay the provisions of the decree until it sees the case. But the producers already are testing out the competitive-bidding item and finding to their delight that it yields more money than ever, during the pres ent picture scarcity. As a result, inde- pendent exhibitors all over the land have set up a howl that the decision meant to free them is actually going to destroy them. , Goldman is one independent who is not howling. Having forced his way to the top of his local heap against terrific odds, he is getting all the first-run pic tures he wants and making big profits on them. The able Philadelphian has demon- strated once for all that the big boys can be licked and that competition is ~ possible. Under the logic of the com- - petitive system, an open market ind ~ better, less expensive product, The anybody's guess. unrestricted buyers can ultimately bring . more producers, selective buying and a se movie business, however, is aot noted “. ge 3 for logic; and how this will all end is
OCR quality for this page
Community corrections
First editor: none yet Last editor: none yet
No user corrections yet.
Comments
Document-wide discussion. Follow the Community Standards.
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.

Continue Exploring

Use the strongest next step for this document: continue reading, jump to the topic hub, or move into the matching agency collection.
Continue Reading at Page 200
Jump straight to page 200 of 228.
Reader
Henry a Wallace — Part 5
Stay inside Henry a Wallace with another closely related document.
Topic
FBI Documents & FOIA Archive
Open the FBI agency landing page for stronger archive context.
FBI
Henry a Wallace Topic Hub
See the topic overview, related documents, and linked subtopics.
Hub

Agency Collection

This document also belongs in the FBI Documents & FOIA Archive landing page, which is the stronger starting point for agency-level browsing and for searches focused on FBI records.
FBI Documents & FOIA Archive
Open the agency landing page for introduction text, topic links, and more FBI documents.
FBI

Explore This Archive Cluster

This document belongs to the Politics & Activism archive hub and the more specific Henry a Wallace topic page. Use these hub pages when you want the broader collection context, linked subtopics, and more documents around the same archive thread.
federal bureau letter
Related subtopics
J Edgar Hoover Appointment and Phone Logs
42 documents · 3899 known pages
Subtopic
American Friends Service Committee
39 documents · 2906 known pages
Subtopic
Senator Edward Kennedy
33 documents · 3523 known pages
Subtopic
ACLU
26 documents · 191 known pages
Subtopic
J Edgar Hoover
24 documents · 1926 known pages
Subtopic
Billy Carter
20 documents · 688 known pages
Subtopic