◆ SpookStack

STEROLS Gin tt.) pe Awe S$, i -@.. an’ Oo Bota witnesses HEL set & states t that the [ . oB. scurce o£ intermation | leading to the Subpoena, nd upon wih Piven f aay questions ox requests will, be based, is the | “testinony z ‘Patricia Haarst given ar. her banks robaps a between february. 9, > 19 76 through February 20, ‘1976; a 3 ‘ | | i fe aie Court for the Northern District o£ falifonsa, Mo. 7 : | H %& os None of the information upon which the: gibstioning “o£ Jay Weiner will be based is the resule, directly or in- . directly, ‘of any electronic surveillance of Jay Weiner, cal . "6, The undersigned is imawaxe of any electronic sur- i veillance of Jay Weiner, directly or indirectly, at any tim, / - | ! 7, That inquiry was made*of ‘the Appropriate Agencies of} the ‘Federal Government to detéxmine if there had been any / 7? electronic - surveillance of the. conversations of the witness Jay Heiner. “eS Be - vo - 43. These Agencies were selected. ‘as ‘appropriate for | inquiry because at the time the reduests were made they were | the only Agencies that had requested authority to conduct and had conduc ted electronic surveillance pursuant to Title TIT of the Omnibus Crim Control. and Safe Streets Act of 1948! Public Law 90-351-°.All national security electronic surveil-j| ‘lences suthorizedzby ‘the Attorney General have been Conducted solely by, end all ‘records of such surveillances have been — maintained by the. Federal < “Bureau of Investigation, “2 79g) The Federal Agesicies £o whom. this inquiry was di- a | x are listed as follows, together with the most recent i date that a response was received to the inquiries made by . the. Department of Justice. : ae Federal Bureau of Investigation- jo .. July 16, 1975 we . Drug Enforcerent Administration | - . . | . June 25, 1975 feo United States Secret Service - | Jume 26,1975 . . Internal Revenue Service. - June 27, 1975 United éustoms Service - - fo ‘July 8, 1975 Te, ae . Sureau of Alechol, “Tébacce and wee Firearms - Jime 24, 1925 7 coe United States Postal. Service | =": a _ "sume ~23. »19.75. j 13 eS "105 Based upon the results of such inquiry the degenent! Uhereby states that there has been no electronic surveillance nil i } -occlrring on prenises known to have been omed,- leased or | ~sLicensed by Jay Weiner, as of the datas. sat forth above," - es “With neforence £0 > Shinetcle, the. affidavit Beevidess ut