◆ SpookStack

ei ite Gab chap ne rar rate ttre hand atl At Nin 00 La hall Ar mae cel aerate Rewriters Dare eS sg Soe RS 9 2 ewe enernwtrerere sire eae + Bre Raat A Ne mt tie aN, wing's ‘ | r I: teams. ° UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT | FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT an EO” ee THE UNITED STATES augs 9 | 7 Veo DONALD: 1 R. BERR Ry “ise MD. “IN RE GRAND JURY PROCEEDINGS: \: OF Pa CHAR, { SUBPOENA OF sy eee SHAH a Lo ‘unereo STATES _ , “IN RE GRAND JURY PROCEEDINGS: PHILLIP KENIXSHINNICK zo svORANDUM-AND ORDER fr 7 é Th a memorandum Sad Bitlet dated July 13, 1976, this: "Court “ordered the me to 138 U. S .C. § 3504, to “file ‘supplemental affidavits. affirming or denying the oceur ‘rence of illegal, electronic surveillance which had been - “claimed in a mot son “filed by the ‘two witnesses, Jay Weiner) and ¥ Phillip Kent sninmick, who had. been subpoenaed in these two cases to. “appear befoke ao grand jury in this district thet is investigating the possible harboring: of federal fugitives 7 -patrigia Hearst and Willian and Emily Herris within this — aiseesbe during the ‘sumer of (1974. In addition, mot ions to guesh Sh gh grounds of ingroper purpose and the fact that th. | + subpoenes are. returnable, to an improper Situs. ware filed by | 2 “both witnesses, and Jay Weiner alone submit ted a motion. for @ “protective order and 2 mot ion request ing supplemental in Struc: A. .tioas to’ the grand jury. In. the Suly 13 nenorendun, I de~ ial ig Nite, “Spyerrea ruling on the other motions pending resolution § oz the - electronic surveillance, issua, ° “The government has, now sub- ~ . tt eT mitted supplerental affidavits denying electronic SUIVe Llane ee -y . ett! Ar etesser wt > m BN oh MRP es Se Ea re Sa weet RMS wtodter its aes tet ontia’ Saetede be Mew ene Ta"