◆ SpookStack

SF 100-65576 LFC:ekf Alamed& authorities are planning to introduce this ‘Califorfia driver's license evidence in court2/19/76 in an effort tow revoke BORTIN's probation. It is noted that jurisdiction ‘for this driver's license prosecution lies in the district - where application was made, San Francisco. State efforts ~ are continuing to secure felony warrant from District Attorney, San Francisco. soo a - '—s- For the intonation of the Bureat and Cleveland Divisions, Cleveland lead set ‘forth in referenced San « Francisco letter, 6/19/75, was prompted by information furnished by BORTIN's probation officer, It is noted tha as in no way Gooperative with either - the FBI or Alameda County authorities during the various \ * HEARNAP inguiries, déspite the fact that information incrim- ~~ inating to MICHAEL BORTIN, sufficient to warrant the revo-: cation-of his probation was made known t Revocationspréceedings were initiated instead by the office of the District Attorney, Alameda County, ; who was obliged to contact the director of Adult Probation, Alameda County, to effect the’revocation. During the revocation proceedings, the probation file compiled by egarding BORTIN was reviewed by Alameda County authorities and reflected an inadequate record of super- f €this review also disclosed that BORTIN_had indi-~ hat he, BORTIN, was to visit Wine, Mansfield, Ohio. This information nformation previously furnished by is contrary to.:the i San Francisco indices disclose that a pro-Maoist is the subject of an RUC file, 12/65, There is no indication that the *-, individual is identical to the possibly fictitious name fefurnished by BORTIN to probation office - q San Francisco Division is continuing attempts {0.2 . “towdetermine BORTIN's, associations with_fugitive oo C COVER PAGE - aot s eM ee EA OT ees a eA OP EY ee. ~