◆ SpookStack

eyes Oo A en, we nad a proprietary right in the original film. If the bank delivered the film or if the police delivgred the ‘ film, the would have had no proprictar dient and : accordingly, the statute would not apply. Under the . latter circumstances our proprietary right would cover _ only that film in our actual possession. Certainly, if an employee of the duplicated the film and attempted to sell it for $20, 000 there would be local violations involved -- probably embezzlement. At this stage we are becoming involved in First Amendment rights with regard to possible purchasers of the film. Iam sure that we would have a very tough time in making a case against members of the news t media. If we develop information that someone actually A profits from this scheme there might be reason to pursue an investigation and a potential prosecution against that individual but we tend to agree at this Stage we may be making too much of this incident. . From our standpoint, it does not appear that the Bureau or our investigation would be harmed by running the film on TV. If itis actually run, we can then take whatever action is fhecessary against the individuals who may have profited illegally from the theft. i 4 eh ated, Be eee Pt eg ( tty I ara. aeilie tin Lae Pr oehe pe eye f gt &, a. * 8 2 a vB ate wate Fe