Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
HEARNAP — Part 14
Page 444
444 / 987
Severél decisions of the Supreme Court have established
they general rule that under the Fourth Amenadment, when probable
cauge to search or arrest is based upon an infermant's tip, the
offfcers relying on the informant must have facts supporting
(1)' the informant's crea@ibility, and (2) the informent's con-
clusion. 3/ The Merch 19 memorandum contains no facts sup 2port—
ing a belief that the telephone informant wes reliable. In
addition, the informant's conclusior. that Hearst was in Apart-
ment 10 does not appear to be supported by underlying--facts
that would justify such a conclusion. Thus in our view the
FBI had no authority to enter Apartment 10 based’ upon the fact
that probable cause existed to believe Hearst was there.
The FBI officers might have hac authority to enter Apart-
ment 10 if they reasonably believed, efter anncuncing their
presence, that forcible:entry was necessary te prevent personal
injury to the officers. 4/ Hewever, we are unabie.- to fing
, sufficient facts stated in the FBI mencrancun which weulé have
‘supported such a belief. ;
: In order to make a final @Getermiration as to wnethes
ane
probable cause existed to support a search of Apartment 16, the.
facts contained in a full report on the incident from the FPEI's
Inspection Division would be most helpfel.- I would recommend
that you request a copy of this report.
II.. aditional Lecal Issues Discusseé in the | March 21
\ Henofendun
The FBI's Karch 21 memorandum discussed several legal
issues which do not appear directly relevant to the avestion
of whether FBI officers had euthority to searcn Apartment 106
“in order to arrest Patty Hearst. We address them here only
for the sake of completeness. ; .
. *
A. Authority cf law enfcrcement officers to search the
premises of the Suspect named an an arrest werrant
to execute the warrant :
=a
Citing Paper v. U.S., 5/ U.S. v. Isines, 6/ and U.S,
v. Retolaza, a page two of the FBI memoreangtm asserts that _
RaW ‘enforcenent officers may lawfully enter and search the
residence of a suspect named in an arrest warrant without
‘ probable cause to believe that the sus spect is at home. That
4
Zi
a
7
-
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Reader
Topic
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic