Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
HEARNAP — Part 12
Page 399
399 / 406
an , ~~
Memo to Mr. White .
Re: HEARNAP
_7-15200
tivestipative Value
Examination of a communication by a psycholinguist may
provide insight into the psychological make-up of the author, from which
we may learn why he acted as he did and how he might act in the future.
The investigator is primarily concerned with "who" did it and "where"
~ can he be found, Knowing the psychological profile of a subject is of
little assistance in locating him. While an estimate of physical characteristics 7
and background data of a subject can be hypothesized, this is by Dr. Miron's
own admission an intuitive process which does not require the extensive
data processing he utilizes. We presently have some capacity for this
technique in the Laboratory. While the psycholinguist can probably
predict future conduct with some. degree of accuracy it is most unlikely |
that he can furnish details as to “when'" and “where” which are sufficient
to enable the investigator to locate the subject.
We would defer to the investigative divisions the question of
applicability, however it would appear to us that the primary value of -
psycholinguistic information lies in a case such as this where you have
_ considerable notoriety and a long, drawn-out scenario which may end up ©
in a confrontation, gun-to-gun, with the victim's life at stake. Such
information should enable us to make a better decision on how to handle
the confrontation. In hijack cases the events will probably move too
guickly for employment of psycholinguistics, —
Testimony Value
While the psycholinguist may be able to offer an expert
_ opinion that a defendant did or did not write a certain communication or
make a certain phone call, the field is probably too new for expertise to
_ have been established, When one views the typical heated and diametrically
opposing views of prosecution and defense psychiatrists, who have been
able to examine the subject first hand, it is reasonable to conclude that
such testimony would only confuse a jury.
4 ‘
In-house versus Gonsultant
If psycholinguistics is determined to be a worthwhile undertaking _
it is strongly recommended that we use a consultant rather than attempt
any in-house capacity. Programs such as those used by Dr. Miron require
PERDANA aor
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Reader
Topic
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic