◆ SpookStack

RAGE Two ® BROWNING CONTACTED ME AGAIN ON MARCH 12, 1974, AND ASKED IF I HAD CHANGED MY MIND ABOUT FURNISHING INFORMATION TO THE STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL» I TOLD HIM-I HAD NOT, THAT THERE WERE MANY PROBLEMS INVOLVED, THAT WE HAD TO INSURE AGAINST POSSIBLE LEAKS AND I COULD STILL SEE NO BASIS. I INFORMED HIM THAT I HAD SPOKEN WITH LOWELL JENSEN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ALAMEDA COUNTY, ABOUT THIS MATTER. JENSEN STATED THAT HE COULD SEE No REASON FOR INFORMATION BEING GIVEN TO THE STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL. THAT OFFICE IS NOT INVOLVED IN ANY PROSECUTIVE ACTION AS THIS IS BEING HANDLED BY JENSEN. JENSEN ALSO TOLD ME THAT NO COPIES OF THE BERKELEY oR OAKLAND POLICE REPORTS OR REPORTS FROM JENSEN'S OFFICE HAVE BEEN FURNISHED TO YOUNGER. - J TOLD BROWNING THAT BASED ON THIS J COULD SEE NO REASON FOR THIS INFORMATION TO BE FURNISHED. HE THEN COMMENTED THAT PROBABLY THE FINAL DECISION WOULD HAVE TO BE MADE BY ATTORNEY GENERAL SAXBE. I AM SURE THE BUREAU WILL AGREE THAT WIDE DISSEMINATION OF OUR INFORMATION IS UNDESIRABLE AND THAT THERE IS NO BASIS AT THIS TIME FOR THE STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL*S REQUEST. 1 STRONGLY FEEL THAT IN THE ABSENCE OF FURTHER INFORMATION UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES SHOULD RESULTS OF OUR INVESTIGATION BE FURNISHD TO YOUNGER'S OFFICE. END RXH FBIHQ ACK FOT wOXXX TWO -_ — . — CLR os a