◆ SpookStack

veo COs ie au ree meee i FEDERAL BUREAU OF vesTiGATION(.. 0 tC COMMUNICATIO“5 SECTION 449PM URGENT 3-13-74 MS MaR 131374 yeah TO DIREETOR (7- 15299) TELETYPE: - Pa ATIN: INTD & GID , {FROM SAN FRANCISCO (7-855) 2P Sanwa j ae ee REMYTEL THIS DATE CONCERNING REQUEST FROM JAMES“BROWNI fei ' Dep.-AD.-Adm— # Dep-A.D-Inv g Asst. Dir.: Admin. - Comp. Syst WW § Ext. Affaire £L Files & Q4y Gen. Env. Ident. Inspection Iniell. .. Plan & Eval i Spee. inv, : Training HW § Lecat Coun. .Ww & Telephone Km w EF Director Sec’y —_ NG, UeS. ATTORNEY, SAN FRANCISCO, THAT RESULTS OF OUR INVESTIGATION THIS CASE BE FURNISHED CALIFORNIA ATTORNEY GENERAL YOUNGER. AS POINT acne ais = rena reat mF ED OUT IN RETEL I TOLD BROWNING I COULD SEE NO REASON FOR SUCH TG BE FURNISHED IN THE ABSENCE OF A NEED TO KNOW, WHICH AT THE PRESENT DID NOT EXIST. BROWNING CALLED ME LATER THIS DATE AND ADVISED, “YOU HAVE BEEN “ OVERRULED BY ATTORNEY GENERAL SAXBE AFTER CHECKING WITH DIRECTOR. ' KELLEY.” I TOLD BROWNING THAT I HAD RECEIVED NO INSTRUCTIO BO oe call NS TO THIS EFFECT FROM MY HEADQUARTERS AND THAT NO REPORT WOULD BE FURNISHED IN THE ABSENCE OF SUCH INSTRUCTIONS. 1 DO NOT FEEL THAT THE ACTIONS OF BROWNING ARE PROPER. IT WOULD . APPEAR PROPER FOR YOUNGER TO SUBMIT A REQUEST FOR SUCH INFORMATION SETTING FORTH THE REASONS FOR HIS NEED, AT WHICH TIME PROPER CONSIDER- ATION COULD BE GIVEN. we 7° 9200 ALE END PAGE ONE - oe wn ene 77% BAR IB 1974 c rari 2 i Sr his . : ur | Laberatory we -