◆ SpookStack

7 . - abt 1062 METH . , : ov epee ; wt my Gye Oem. & >. oO. 27 ee a! we Amr UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT ating + toe ee ee. or tte aS 2 = Mr. R. E, Gebhardt » - Sou see nee roves See Att: Me. M.A,Morrow) Se 40m. — or Memorandu oo. LD = Mr. We OV. Cleveland . rrr To |: MR. W. R. WANNALL-G pate: May 10, 1974 0 From :MR. G. C. moore) VY 1 Me I. A. Mintz meen, ~ sunyect: SYMBIONESE LIBERATION ARMY (SLA) ., . * Ahgwe. few. EXTREMIST MATTER - URBAN GUERRILLA , . erence WARFARE . . . - lephame Ral ; ; 1 _ Direct See'y — WN s//6/rf jer +o ARG PEN jhe a to proposed Departmental action in not allowing testimony by a ' the kidnapping of Patricia Hearst. Se a Purpose of this memorandum is to recommend concurrence San Francisco Agent in a local case relative to electronic _. - surveillance activity by the Bureau. | _ : aan ta SLA is a miltiracial revolutionary group which has been involved in violent activiejes including murder, bank robbery, and —FSAT 24 You have been previously advised of receipt of a subpoena‘. 4/29/74 by Special Agent (SA) Curtis Jimerson of the San Francisco Office in connection with a local court action resulting from the 2/7/74 arrest of Robert Hood, a member of the Vietnam Veterans & Against the War, on a charge of assaulting a police officer. Hood, an associate of SLA personnel, and his attorney, claim existence of unlawful electronic surveillances against them and a mmber of | a their associates at various locations in the San Francisco area - ‘during the period 1/10/74 to present, re g Subpoena orders production of all records, logs, trans- cripts, tapes, or other indicia of electronic surveillances on the above-mentioned persons and places, . San Francisco has advised Hood and other individuals and locations mentioned in the subpoena have not been subjects of electronic surveillance coverage by that offic. Assistant U. S, Attorney, San Francisco, has thus far failed in attempts to quash the subpoena and on 5/8/74 Agent Jimerso: ‘and the Assistant U. S. Attorney appeared in Alameda County Superior Court, at which time a hearing of this matter was held and arguments 157-30832 ae ger VE AE ww