◆ SpookStack

cp eeemeh ene dene or eteastcitomt id Lene? Fe le. S955 Ong aE THE. NEW SOCIAL: ORDER. Foustea, ‘on | -G2.! Brown. for the alleged: “purpose - ‘of. telling: private. ‘ ~ they. “‘shall.or -shall-not. hire;: has now been exposed as just: ‘another bureaucratic agency: designed’ to“help build the: Brown: Patronage: Ma- chine. | This disclosure was: ‘made when -the proposed © ‘budget, of the . ’ BLELP.C,. showed that it had now. decided to fatten up its.’ ‘anpointive | ' staff at the expense of the'-Taxpayers‘-- thereby ‘affording Brown ad- aitional opportunities,-to’ make ‘Patronage Appointments “and .build-a ~ stronger, “minority” :power: machine-to dominate’ the: ‘Democratic ‘Party. _ 80. that in’ 1964 Brown: can: ba. a real’ candidate: for "President. wo 2. Nor “‘T00 MUCH at ‘first. -- but more: ‘and more: tater * ees ‘seems. “£6 be’ ‘the sy pattern of Brown's expensive Patronage. Commissions .« This is.illus-. Co trated bythe -budget- Tevelations of ‘the: ‘past: nine’ ‘Honths_ of.’ peration . - of the. FE.P.C., and,.the proposed coming :tw e-nonth ‘budeet f ° Commission. Here. is. the: fnutshell't, storys ee . : * For. the: ‘first nine months: only. $202, $53 was ‘taken ‘out. or ‘the. oy “ . “pockets: of California Taxpayers for. this monstrosity’ of.: ad -" -goctalistic=communistic. intervention “petween the: relationships’ ' of employers and: employees,” This: included $42,750 for. the. . -- galaries:. of the five: politicians appointed: as “Commissioners ° “> (Russian. ‘would be, sCommissars") ‘: ‘by ‘Brown 4: after nine. “ months of: gestation,’ -pureaucratic : pregnancy.is, beginning. - show its political: development, and: the: Commi: 319n | vants #288» 106, for: the: coming 4 fiscal years Se, *ymiais WE ‘UNTTIE THE: PA ACKAGE ; ere -eina the ‘total. walarte and. oh Gp ‘be increased. by $62,735, {€3.6%)} and: the. _ present. ey a eae Increased Exon. 27 to. hae fey: 2 ' How ° tRE ‘KBOUT: ‘po, BE. ‘ EDUCATED : £ ind B, ‘ money: éut, of our Tax. Pocket... ‘Because - ‘the TUES? sc. a “a - ‘education (this could.mean, brainwashing’ by. propa anda us? “py intimidation) and: resgarch section. - This. would “dinvol 4 (5) =. Le “positions: and related. expense ss The: apn etven. ‘with -the- get s _ Feqvest ist: . “such additional funds are. Se rt ee visisas of the leper cote" ‘whieh: ‘aeals wit [-disoriminations; . pete Law DOESN'T SAY ‘THAT. ‘eTt. cannot be. ‘found: anywhere’ in’ the..law; . _that the’ Commission is ‘airected to carry on a formal education. pro~ -; 2 gram or engage in original research. In fact, the ‘legislative | auditor ~ gays, "the law did not contemplate the FEPC © employing. a full-time ~ education and research staff, nor does it seem the Legislature spe- cifically-directs the Commission to engage in research. This is a higher level of service than tas authorized by the legislature when it approved the original budget request.* Ate?