◆ SpookStack

OTA ais ad . . rN a to ths effect as to what Lr, vethmers is agruing and 1 want to object to that argumant,.. AR. VaTHKERS; The foot itself that he sits here ou trial is evidence of that. VHE COURT; Just a moment. BR, £A4RSONS; I @ak thet it be stricken out and - the jury instructed to disregard it. | . ae TES COURT; I Qian't got the argunent prior ( ‘to SR your objection, what was the nature of that ergument? Mr. -~ xorsons mde an objection to your argument a ‘moment ago, KR. DSTHSRS; well, your Honor, ny argument ™ was this, that ir, karsons raised the question that the pioturss which the witnosses had Adentified were not here placed in evidence, and therefore there was 8Iu8 question ~ &s to whether the pictures identified by the veoples! ; witnes.es were the pictures of this res)ondent,. In answer to thst 1 st-ted that the significant f.ch remains that — ufter identifie: tion weg made by picturgs this ‘Pes ondent wag urrested, anc such identifiestion of the pictures aViuantly led to the arrest of this Respondent. ER. £4250N35; 1 obiset to thst. There is no evicsencs of that fact. fs COURT; Well 1 think thet is «4 legitimite _orgumant. You may procesd, (argumsnts concluded) - 148-