◆ SpookStack

as man, that ig a fagt, but he wusg't esked about any sonvarsation that ho had with this witnaas, ao this isn't proper rebuttal, KA, vSTUdsita; MY theory is that the witnese in Fesponse to direst examination toatified hefore this = court be had pever. soon this res andent ‘beforn.s the purpose of thia testimony is ta show thet vy convorsation, : with this witness, or my purpess is by showing that eonversation, to refute the ststenent of Mr, Doyle, oe Ma, aR3ONS; hot proper ispeachuent, If he had asked Kr, lioyle if he had told this witness something, he might go into it. — : THS GOvRTs Objection austiined to it, ‘KR, DESTHMERI: No further quastions, The ieople will rast your Loner, WRe aetw0hs; Bay it pleasa the Court, 1 desira to racuest Gt this tine thet the Court dastruet the jury as to the lav raistivs to the right of tha resjondent mot to testify in his om behelf, and the considecation or leek of consideration of thst fuet «hich tha jury hava a right te tive; this instruction to ba in such form as tha Gourt Teols it ought to be, | EX. UsfhhGha; and ig 4% your requast that that instrvetion ba given at this tine? sh = . VR, kaLJON3: No, in connection with the general a instructions, i haven't submitted a formal ro‘uest along that line. {arguments by counsel to the jury) (uuring e&rgumants) Ba. £.2c0NG; 1 don’t think thers .s any eridence = 147 « ay : oo “y