Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Fred Hampton — Part 3
Page 74
74 / 251
70 Nos. 77-1698, 77-1210 & 77-1370
made a “mistake” in allowing the federal defendants to
determine the relevancy of the documents. He thereupon
ordered the complete O’Neal and plaintiffs’ files main-
tained by the FBI to be turned over to plaintiffs as well
as the counterintelligence documents which plaintiffs
had previously sought. In response to the order, Govern-
ment counsel turned over approximately 100 documents
which contained many deletions. Hearings were held to
determine the propriety of the deletions. The court
sustained all deletions which did not mention the BPP
directly.
On February 2 plaintiffs moved to reopen discovery in
order to depose the FBI defendants and other agents.
Three days later plaintiffs again issued a trial subpoena
on Held, this time requesting certain documents relating
to the case, including those concerning the Racial
Matters Squad and payments to O’Neal. Government
counsel moved to quash the subpoena and Assistant
United States Attorney Kanter represented to the court
that the plaintiffs would be furnished the entire O’Neal
file, including all information concerning payments to
him. On February 26 the FBI completed its turnover of
the O’Neal documentary material, and again it was
represented that this constituted the complete file.
At a later date Mitchell was called to the stand. Prior
to his testimony, plaintiffs asked for a hearing to review
the Government’s deletions in certain documents which
had been furnished. During the hearings relevant
documents which had not been produced were dis-
covered to exist in the Government’s files. Moreover,
after Mitchell took the stand he volunteered certain in-
formation allegedly supplied by O’Neal that was not con-
tained in any document which had been produced by the
Government. The court ordered Mitchell to search for
the document. Kanter again represented that the com-
plete O’Neal file had been furnished. While Mitchell was
still on the stand, he reported that he had found the
document in a FBI file relating to a BPP member who
lived in Rockford, Illinois. Mitchell conceded that the
document should have been placed in the Hampton or
O'Neal files but that it had not been located there. Plain-
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic