Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Fred Hampton — Part 3
Page 52
52 / 251
48 Nos. 77-1698, 77-1210 & 77-1370
against Koludrovic is insufficient. In his official report
he stated that more than one shot was fired at the
raiders as they entered the apartment and he reiterated
this conclusion at the Coroner’s inquest. There was,
however, no evidence of an agreement, either tacit or
express, between him and any other defendant to
conceal or distort facts about the raid. His task at the
apartment was made especially difficult by the raiders’
disruptive search prior to his arrival and, if his
examination of the premises was less than thorough, the
evidence suggests that this was the result, at worst, of
negligent rather than intentional conduct.
There is, however, evidence—and reasonable infer-
ences—pointing to Sadunas’ participation in the post-
raid conspiracy. Sadunas’ initial ballistics test was
incomplete; he compared spent shotshells from the °
apartment only with the weapons seized at the apart-
ment and ignored the weapons which had been used by
the raiders. His examination resulted in a crucial
misidentification which would have remained uncor-
rected absent Zimmers’ subsequent tests and con-
clusions. When he learned of Zimmers’ findings, Sa-
dunas retested the shells comparing them with all the
weapons—including those of the raiders. After these
tests, Sadunas readily admitted his mistake. Given this
set of events, we think that the determination whether
his misidentification was the result of professional
incompetence or conspiratorial conduct should have been
left for the jury.
C. Participants in the IID Investigation
Meade and Mulchrone, through their participation in
the IID investigation, were not involved in the dimen-
sion of the conspiracy which resulted in the imprison-
ment and prosecution of the survivors without legal
basis: rather, their actions reasonably could have been
found to have encouraged the continuation of the
unfounded prosecution by suppressing the development
of inconsistent evidence against the raiders, Hanrahan,
and Jalovec. Police Superintendent Conlisk initiated the
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic