Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Fred Hampton — Part 3
Page 118
118 / 251
114 Nos. 77-1698, 77-1210 & 77-1870
qualified immunity to the prosecutor also could have an
adverse effect upon the functioning of the criminal
justice system.” In the present case, the counterattack to
the publicity was for the purpose of avoiding such an
adverse effect.
It is the state authorities who prosecute, and irrespec-
tive of whether the federal defendants may have thought
prosecution was proper, I fail to see a jury case of
malicious prosecution against them. One, of course, does
not have to be in the prosecutor’s office to be chargeable
with malicious prosecution but he should have some con-
nection with bringing about the wrongful prosecution
more than just thinking that the defendant should be
prosecuted.
2. Claimed obstructionism. Under my view the
matter of the raid would only remain in litigation as to
the shooters. Without the issue of conspiracy as to the
raid, the post-hoc claimed acts of obstructionism, upon
which the Anderson plaintiffs particularly rely, have not
been, it seems to me, demonstrated to have harmed the
plaintiffs. As Chief Judge Fairchild has pointed out in
his concurrence, it seems clear that plaintiffs cannot
recover damages for injury to reputation, without more.
If the defendants have engaged in the obstruction of
justice or perjury the criminal courts not this civil suit
are the proper place for their consideration.
Indeed, the history of criminal proceedings in the area
with which we are concerned during the past decade
testifies to the fact that high office or powerful position
does not provide a shield against successful prosecution
for violations of the law.
I find it almost incredible that Sadunas, who made a
mistake in identifying one of many guns he examined
from which a shell had been fired, is being left in the
case. This is particularly true because he is paying a
penalty for honesty by promptly acknowledging his mis-
take when he made a reexamination and because this is
not a case of a rifle or pistol cartridge where the rifling
in the barrel gives a much more distinctive basis for
idereteatzon than in the shotgun shell casing here in-
volved.
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic