◆ SpookStack

we A Rohert &. Dornan Saw - continued: Hungary or '63 witn Caechoslovakia but he says I think I'd better cive States evidence hnere..now kev can we brand hir as an evil kind of in- former..let me esk vou to anewer it first. Vahn: I aon's think you cen brand kim 2s an evil kind of informer if he is #£ truly motivated by 2 cincere desire to be vatriotic to his country by reversing his field..so to spé2k...vy 180 desrees. I don't think that was the tnse with very meny people who either were friendly. witnessess or who recanted..I'n sorry to say. I would tike To think 3 they were hishly motivated..,-~---- » they wanted to stay working in : the business..it was economic -----, . Dornan: How about someone who became @ friendly witness who suvsosedly 228t Jesst I thoucht so till I read the beok..ond thet's why I thirk it's a worth white beok...t “Bayard of those wno became fri endly witness ess salyarccd thoir cereers.,, egeake Demetrich, Rosen and it soos on end on..-bvt I rotice Larry Perks vas 2 friendly Witness, bet his ecereer becane terminated it seemed to me. Vahn: (VYekn tells about Farks evpesrance first vnfriendly then sfter Colum:ia pietures told him he'd better eccoperste, he did..he was first setor oublically to tectify..He testified in executive session when he coopernted, but he still didn'* vork aseain...vehn tried to reech Parks through several channels, but was vnable to do’ so. ) Dornen to ieltz: Cold you answer suestion shout informing on friends? Naltz: Tivo issues nefore us, first acree with Vahn..thet it's verfectly possible for veonle to chance their minds sincerely on a poli tions mote ter... but in the actual c2-e of tho-e who esme forward in the Holly- wood situstion..? think it was vurely to work, they were not intforn- inn the sovernnent about any clot for instens é..in which they were trvine to seve the United States.. (Commorciel breek) , Mane off until subject of Algier Hiss and Whitacker Chamhers cama un. Malte: ...Uies wis innocent end thet Chembers was a liar...you menticned the Rosen nberes before, I believe thet they were commlietely innocent end thet =Sthel Rosenbterg'=? brother whe hed been saveht trying to stenl a HG Few vounds of whet rou use in atomic enersy. .ah,. (Dornan, .platonium) Neltz: Yeah, something like that..that he named her and her husband in order to cet himself off, I helieve thot they were abtolutelyinnocent and tint there cre books thet heve heen published that demonstrete thet. and I went to add, since it's current...I think Angela Davis is innocent 'm convinced sheets innocent.. Dornan: I wish vou hadn't seid thet and I'll tell vou why..there's an unwritten lew that even thoursht we're a few hundred miles away.. Majtz: Oh, walre not sumc -osed to discuss it.. Dornan: You can, but I can't turn eround and respond or ## argue with you without intimidsting a vossible future jurror who mieht be soins to ego un there. 3Byv that response you might euvess how I feel..I don't know enough ebout the first two thinss..tne other..2bout Angela Devis, I'11 be Tollowine with crest interest because of what's incredeble circum stanci2l evidence to me. Rut if you think that the Rosenbergs were in- nocent..do you think . thet nossibly..I'll try to so alone with vovr locic here...that vossibly there was 2 ecane-coat execution here... since “ney were the only neovle executed that 1 know of 2iter the second werld wer for thic tird of crime, Simjler to story Frenk Sinvtra kired you(ialtz) to of Privete Slocan(?only man to be executed for his write..The Brecutio tjine-6f kind of crim ee i ee, Te ee ee te ees - om |