Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Frank Sinatra — Part 21
Page 50
50 / 157
Sinatra Drops Look Mag Libel Suié=
New Case To Test Right To Privacy
_ Frank Sinatra will attempt to clarify rights to privacy of personali-
ties in. the public eye, he stated yesterday in dismissing his $2,300,000
libel suit against Look mag in Federal Court In joint agreement with
Look, he then filed a test suit in Superior Court here for in
PtNew action, which d ify d st
New action, which doesn’t specify damages beyond the statu
minimum, will assume that the ----- Be oayene ene atutory $3,000 _
Look articles published earlier this
year about Sinatra were printed in .-
good faith, However, suit will at-
teipt to determine right of the
press to “delve into, and disclose,
the personal or private—as dis-
‘“. (Continued on Page 17) *
tinguished from thé~pF0iessivie:—<o publish facts as to all gyblic
and public—aspects of an enter- figures ... “not simply as o-
ner's life,” according to joint fessional performers, but also
sthtement issued by Sinatra and persons.” ;
ok reps. Meanwhile, Sinatra and Look
n joint statement, Sinatra con- have cancelled their agreement, —
tirlued that he didn’t deny the right under which the singer-attgr was |
to discuss or criticize his profes- to have written a by-lined add biog
sional activities, but unless the for publication in the mag.
privacy issue was settled, a “pub- © ~~ "~~ a
lic figure” was ‘‘a second-class citi-
zen, in that he is denied rights
which others enjoy.” He’s bringin
the Superior Court suit specifically
to settle these issues, since he
understands the courts have never
really established such rights to
jvacy, he commented,
Further, test case involving Look
uld be a good one because the
g is of “recognized standing—
net an expose or scandal-type pub-
lication—and the decision will be
by the courts of California, where
go many entertainment personali-
ties and a large segment of the en-
tertainment industry is headquar- ~ “h ECR
Speaking for Look, v.p. John F. ALL INFOR
Harding hoped that the case might erage a CKMATION CONTAINED
“settle the issue for all communica- - “i. S UNCLASSIF
tion media. Mag’s position is that wea A ¥
“any entertainment. personality
who’ manifests. ‘a’. desire ‘for pub-
licity .as..to hig professional ‘and
peblic activities and affaira_cannot
sipply turn’! on “publicity. as-.
wants,*or needs: it, and -toracit,
“at iether: tinies, or sift’ and ‘s
it aa he, wishes,” according ‘to
' staterhent: The-press -hag the”
=
&
eon OAs
"Daily Variety’ '
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
federal bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic