◆ SpookStack

-_ oe “Colonel: ‘John ‘Te. %e a “Maroh: 17; 1988, on, nm - . 7 7 . ” - . «< . . ? i . + wt os : ae ara So far. only Intelligence? personnel, at Chanute. Pield;. thisr ; office, and yourself are advised of this case. I feel that the’ Asste« Chief of- Staff,.G-2,. Second District, AAFTIC, Ste Loule, Missouriz- should-be advised and.I will instruct the: Intelligence’ officer, chanute’: : Field so to advise such officer, unless you advise me to the contrary ~. Fe “ ..° on or. before Monday, March 22.. ‘The Asate. Chief: of Staff, G-2, Second ’- _-. Distriot; is Lte Colonel Fred W. Siebert,, formerly Intelligence, Offias _ at Soott Field, Illinois, who 1t is believed would cooperate to peace a fullest extent with this office in any handling’ of the -case.. 5 RTS co ece - *. As related to you. during our: phone’ conversation, it wasa y wo the first. plan to arrest Subject in Champaign during the weekend: offs * , March: 1$-14 on a morals charge because sexual- intercourse was. aateredi:+ ' into between Subject and However, the final: decision. max. against thiae- It is expected that will. return for. anothers Loe . wieit with. Subject the weekend. of April.3, at whioh time-it is believed + | ’ another, opportunity: will be presented to arrest Subject on a: morals . ; charge e« If the meeting of. April 5. between Subjeot and OOOUT® .. > 4n Chicago’as is believed likely, such arrest could be, made by, thes} are - fs 7 © “"Chioago.Police at the behest of- this. office with: no complicationa, what— oe 7) ever; and‘in such @ manner that-there Would be no publicity. and’ thataa~ > * ; 7 this/offioe. would at.all times: be in. control: of: the situations.“ Arrest * ene : 2. vv, On such: &, morals charge’ would, provide. something’ concrete. upon whiok- tox® j oaiy base: disoipl inary action’or a transfer. of Subject by. authoritiess ingses:. < . Washington.} Also,-1it might, be thought advisable’ to give the arrest® : ete, SufELoxLent publi chty. that, Ee. Re. would not’ care: to: intervene- in theme ee yonat matterss: > [an a wee! were, ‘ tees 7 vf - . * ~ Sincere Ly “yours jens <P, Pe BOYER! f° , Lt. Colonel, MI. Me a a Inolssess*.. . , “8 ea oan a > #1 - Report: of March: 6, Review. of Service: Record: ot ee oe "*-™ March’ 9, Results. of Wail: Cover. yo PSO | Meroh'14, Results,of Mail: Cover* ~ Ae g beat ye o " Maroh'16,. Surveillance: of Subject. rt a March‘ 16,:Rosulter of. Mat2" Cover: ae ° ~~ e . . Bete yo wf F _ 7. : a ne “et : : e. ~ : eum. . : . s.r e tame - . - ‘ . . : sot . > 8 tts . . *, re y . pote wee At te oa ae i “ok : an - r? “, on ~ - et . + . “uo we tele geod - Pre og oe Bg a “PS 80%, sy ‘poading” overt the: ‘abovet letter, sT. “finds tratt it: is mostly ftiled ~ 3". 2 with oomment! on thes illieit?liaison -Detween: Subject and - ah ", Aotually; thivids: only a’ detailéof.the case:but:I have:dealt with 1t? ~~ , Decausesit: Presents; the: most: inmediate:chance: to. “grapple, with: the; Subjects” Q . * n “a0 oS ry Ww + soe x * . i 2 as ad et lée nhs <7 can ee a ° _ S!