Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Desi Arnaz — Part 5
Page 20
20 / 35
+
aoe ee a
a-—SDBAR, MR. O'BRIAN,” writes Ben Rothstein, 4229 sheri-
; dan ave., Bronx 56, “Allow me to take exception to your recent
reference to radio station WPAT as ‘that doll of a station.’
First, understand my criticiam is that of an ex-musician.
I willingly admit the music played is of the highest quality
although lacking in excitement. My principal objection to
-WPAT's music policy ts that it doesn’t extend the courtesy
of announcing the title of a selection nor the names of the
performers. Lo 7 me
. “Many years ago, and I believe it was Fred Waring, a
bandleader lost a suit which claimed that. records ‘sre for
home consumption and not the unpaid orchestras of radio
stations. Thousands of musicians were denied employment
as a result of the freedom to use other performers and other
creative talents without paying musicians, = =
“Tt is true now that only a handful of the top musicians
in the country make royalties from recordings. However, I
will bet you the price of the Journal-American that the top
musicians earn less than the top group of any craftsmen of
any kind. This of course is beside the point. ~ -
* s e
“FOR THE LITTLE MONEY WPAT spends for its en-
ewe Lhe major trouble is the way ft presente ite utter fabrica-
‘tions as fact: Elliot Ness has Crennnmweee
had ‘assumed for him credit .
for aolving more TV crimes
‘than Peter’ Gunn, Martin -
Kane, Richard Diamond and
frank Hogan. = .
oot 2 & 2
NOW COMES a letter from
a Brooklyn widow of an FBI
man whose posthumous repu-
tation been muddied by
' \Beestsé this lady asks that
“her identity not be divulged
rior the precise contents of her
‘letter, which contains con-
, siderable - documentation to
“prove her regretful point, we
«shall paraphrase her sed com-
+ "Tt seems her husband per-
‘Yormed the role in the famous
+ et neh cept
ee nen
ROBERT STACK
* ‘Bremer, Hamm and Weyerhauser kidnapings, the raid on
-FBI “Ma Barker” case which |
“The Untouchables” attached
’ Solves Too Much —
'* te Elliot Ness’ television ¢ast of fictional characters. _ q
’ > he lady mentions the “cold, cynical, careless attention
-t@ truth which goes into “The Untouchables" TV. scripts..
_ She thinks it is doing a disservice to Elliot Ness to have at-
tached to his name at this posthumous date so many ridicuious,}
impossible feats of crime prevention and solution as to make
‘that great hero’s own estimable government service pale in
-- The widow -doubts her husband and his FBI mates
battled Ma and Fred Barker for the benefit of Desi Arnaz|
and the show’s ratings at the expense of actual history. Among |.
the impressively documented history of her husband’s wotk).
was a full page in ‘the FBI publication “The Investigator,” |
which relates his feats in the “Ma Barker” case, and the
John Dillinger’s hideout and many others.
- The lady seeks no aggrandizement, no recourse except
‘to point up the fact that the show, contrary to what is so].
widely accepted by the public by its pseudo-realistic dramati-
gation of crimes involving real characters and actual news]
-stories, is not at all what it seems. The widow concludes with
Shakespeare’s: “But who filches from me my good name/
_robs me of. that which enriches not him, and makes me poor|
- indeed.” , :
’ (And if the lady will send her present address, we will],
-yeturn_ her treasured evidence forthwith.) tenet
e wanes . « *« . .& ,
fe ne te
tertainment the least it could do would be to give credit. on
the air to the artists on the many fine recordings it plays. If
I heard a@ strange vocalist on a fine recording, would I have to
call WPAT and ask them who did what? Y am sure the
artists deserve better than they get from WPAT. They de-
serve at least this for what they give. ot
“One other thing: WPAT uses a type of music which,
though of the highest calibre,-is on the whole pretty bland.
I get around quite a bit during the day and a lot of places
are tuned to WPAT. However, since this is Mostly back-
ground music, no one listens very closely. Do you think
anyone starts listening when the commercial starts? =
: “It is my feeling that the advertising also blends into
; the unidentifiable background, too, regardless of the. large
, Budjence WPAT certainly enjoys. As an afterthought, what
does WPAT offer in the way of time for public service
dustity its imphasis on music? I'm afraid I only can offer
tt e worst possible opini 5
ven if you think it’s a ‘dol OF 8 Baton
j Whew! ss « woe Spee
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Reader
Topic
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
federal bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic