◆ SpookStack

SU 164-24 urchase of the land since 5/17/74, sas ordered b7C [ [nas been charged by Maricopa Counts b6 authorities; Phoenix, Arizona, > pTe nd is due to go to trial on that charge in moenix on November 5, 1975. Salt Lake City Division se against b6é ere 1) concerning above mentioned but USA, b7c a ake City, Utah, has held opinion in abeyance pending outcome of prosecution by Arizona authorities. Kane County Attorney and Kane County Sheriff criticized in t s_ for not filing esides in the b6 b7C area wit has received much news and press coverage including National TY coverage and National_publication and has "flaunted" law enforcement in Utah a S Well as being an embarrassment to the Church of Jesus Christ of oo teg Saints. The LDS authorities have excommunicated and prior to moving into the Utah area, resided in Montana with It is noted that_Phoenix Division was originator of a communication in the ease based on an anony- b6 mous telephone_call gting thatL_————— was BIC residing pith LO Rn the Glen Canyon, Utah, area. This proved to be unfounded. There to be nothing in the article concerning| __juhich was an enclos eferenced b6é Phoenix airtel To Seattle to indicate that is b7C identical to DB, with the anonymous caller suggesting that was residing with Sait Lake City Division feels that the anonymous ealler suggesting that[__ fis identical with D. B. COOPER is an attempt to cause the FBI to "hassie"[ and any ctetenieninichhieintieeeaRiei nen iieimimmimmicinieies = § ict -~ 2 DB Cooper-13810 m ‘