Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
D B Cooper — Part 18
Page 74
74 / 503
SAC, Seattle January 3, 1972
Eleven latent fingerprints, one latent
impression, either fingerprint or palm print, and
two latent palm prints of value developed on two
envelopes, 923 and Q27, and two letters, Q24 and
Q28. No latent impressions of value developed on
remaining specimens.
Ten latent fingerprints not identical with
fingerprints 6£f following named individuals:
b6
b7C
The remaining latent fingerprint, which is a tip
impression, and the latent impression, which may
be a fingerprint or palm print, were compared,
insofar as possible, with fingerprints of the
above-named individuals, but no identification
effected. No palm prints located here for above-
named individuals. °
Specimens enclosed for respective
submitting offices.
Page 2
LC #A-45410
DB Cooper-5407
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Reader
Topic
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic