Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Criminal Profiling — Part 5
‹
Page 1
1 / 25
JOURNAL OF INTERPERSONAL VIOLENCE / September 1986
Identifying murderers who had earlier been sexually abused was
accomplished by using interview or official record information about
whether the subject had been sexually abused as a child, adolescent, or
adult. Information about symptoms and criminal behaviors was
obtained in a similar manner. A ‘‘yes” response required confirma-
tion through offender disclosure and background record; an answer
recorded as “suspected” was based on the offender's recollection. For
this aspect of the research, both answers were coded as “‘yes.”” We
acknowledge the limitations of this variable, which could be either
underreported due to memory loss over the years or incorrect because
of offender error in memory reconstruction. In addition, the increased
public attention to sexual victimization may have influenced offend-
ers to give a positive response. It is important to keep in mind thatall
subjects in this study were convicted of sexually oriented murder.
This report is based on our analysis of convicted, incarcerated, sexual
murderers for whom there were data available on early sexual abuse
in their life histories; on their sexual/aggressive interests, fantasies,
and practices; and on their criminal behaviors. At the time of data
collection, these men represented a group of sexually oriented mur-
derers who were available for research purposes (thatis, whose appeal
process was complete), and who were also able to participate in the
in-depth interview conducted by the agents. Murderers were excluded
from the sample if they were actutely mentally disordered and unable
to respond to interview questions (N = 2). They were selected for a
project to investigate law enforcement profiling techniques (Ressler
et al., 1985); in addition, they do not represent a random sample.
FINDINGS
When questioned about prior sexual abuse, 12, or 43%, of those
murderers responding (28) indicated such abuse in childhood (age
1-12); 9, or 32%, were abused in adolescence (age 13-18); and 10, or 37%,
gs adults (over age 18).
Symptoms and behavior indicators. The comparison of sexual
abuse in childhood and adolescence by symptoms and behaviors
presentin childhood, adolescence, and adulthood for murderers who
had and who had not been sexually abused is presented in Table 1.
For the overwhelming majority of symptoms and behavioral indica-
e5
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic