Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Criminal Profiling — Part 4
Page 4
4 / 25
JOURNAL, OF INTERPERSONAL. VIOLENCE / September 1986
been the first in the homicide drama to use physical force directed
against his subsequent slayer’ (p. 252). An example is the husband
who attacked his wife with a milk bottle, a brick, and a piece of
-oncrete block while she was making breakfast. Having a butcher
knife in her hand, she stabbed him. Wolfgang (1958) found victim-
preciptated homicides represented 26% of a total of 588 homicides
studied through police reports in Philadelphia. Adding to this con-
cept, Schafer (1968, p. 152) concluded that “it is far from true that
all crimes ‘happen’ to be committed; often the victim’s negligence,
precipitative action, or provocation contributes to the genesis or
performance of a crime.”
In contrast to this view, FBI profilers, in their work of analyzing
crime scenes for clues leading to a suspect in an unsolved homicide,
took a different approach. They did not find it helpful to perceive the
victim as provoking the murder. Rather, the agents tried to be aware
of how the offender thought and, subsequently, how he would
respond to key characteristics of a victim. For example, a vicum
wearing ared dress and shoes was perceived by the offender as “asking
for it.” Such a victim can not communicate because the offender
selects and interprets “communication cues”’ of which the victim is
totally unaware. The agents understood the offender’s habitual rea-
soning pattern that selects out characteristics of the victim, building a
strong justification for violating her. The offender may retrospec-
tively think he went “‘a bit too far,” but will hold to his justifications.
If a victim is passive, this is reason for attack; if the victim struggles,
this is reason for the attack, and so it goes.
Thus the agents regarded all victim and crime scene information as
critical data in their investigations. As a result of their insights into
understanding the motivation of the offender, agents at the Behavioral
Sciences Unit of the FBI Academy initiated a study of sexual homicide
crime scenes and patterns of criminal behavior. Data obtained in the
study were examined from the perspectives of crime scene analysis
and of victim-murderer interaction.
STUDY
For several years, FBI agents, in profiling sexual murderers by
analyzing crime scenes, have typed sexual murderers and the crime
scene in terms of an organized/disorganized dichotomy. The premise
63
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic