◆ SpookStack

-. Li&eAaceer Bw, aber, Jr., Kaneas, Illinois To fully ‘understand the political situation in this country we must have knowledge of the COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS (CFR), There have been several books written on the sub- ject, alf in 1962, One of the best is Mary M. Davison's ''The Secret Government of the United States". This is « hook that everyone should read. It costs only a dollar and can be had from ; om The Greater Nebraskan, 1330 Turner Boulevard, Omaha 5, Nebraska. . - Since Nelson Rockefeller haa become a leading contender for the Republican nomination for the Presidency in 1964 and is a great power within the party; and since he holds equally great power within the Democratic Party, through his control of the Council On Foreign Relations (shared with a few othera), the citizen who does not understand the intricate, hidden web of po- litical and financial influence within the CFR is completely in the dark about Nelson Rockefeller. When Rockefeller said, a short time ago, that he was for the conservatives, the liberals, and the progressives, he was telling us that he stood for no political principle. He stood for the CFR. He could run on either ticket, Democratic or Republican, It really makes little difference to him whether he is elected or whether John F. Kennedy, who is aleo CFR, is elected. In either case, Nelson Rockefeller {anc the other small group of members of the CFR whe control it} would con- trol the government, ; ; , What it amounts to is that we now have a one-party system, In the Federal Government, high- ranking positions are held by members of the CFR, no matter to which party the President nom- inally belongs. This is illustrated by the fact that such persons as JOHN J. McCLOY, CHRISTIAN HERTER, JOHN FOSTER DULLES, DILLON, ALLAN DULLES, DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER, NEL- SON ROCKEFELLER, and many others, have held high office under both Democratic and Republican administrations. Even Thomas E. Dewey held city, county and state political positions, sometimes in Democratic administrations and sometimes in Republican. The list is long, What then, at nat- ional levels, is the difference between the two parties? There is none. All of the above are mem- bers of the Council On Foreign Relations, All have promoted the objectives of the Council On For- eign Relations.We have, in effect, a one-party system, and that one party is the Council On Foreign Relations. Are there other countries with one-party political systerma? I will name a few, Russia, Jugo- slavia, Poland, Hungary, Rumania, Albania, Outer Mongolia, North Korea, Ceylon, Indonesia, . North Vietnam, China, Cuba are some of them, They have open, one-political-party syatems. In a this country, the general public are not yet aware of the fact that we have a one-party system. t This trend is not good. For, in a one-party system, the people have nothing to say about how the government igs run and what the policy of the government shall be. No matter how they vote, they get the same resulte. There might be a slight change in personnel, a slight shift in posi- tions, such ag Agsistant Secretary of State Dillon in the Eisenhower administration shifting to Secretary of the Treasury in the Kennedy administration. But that is all, No matter whether the President calls himself Democrat or Republican, he directs affairs so as to continue the one-party system; and he follows the policies set down by the Council On For- eign Relations, . Is it any wonder, then, that the United States Government continues to assist the other one- party system governments---that is, the Communist governmente---in every way possible? We assist them with money, training their soldiera with military equipment and supplies, with food, with industrial equipment, with know-how, with education, ‘ We assist them in every' way we can. Particularly when they are in political difficulties, we come to their rescue with political support and even military action. WE ARE NOW SUPPORTING THE CONGO AGAINST KATANGA, WE ARE ASSISTING CASTRO BY SUPPORTING HIS CO-.CON- SPIRATOR, JUAN BOSCH, IN THE TAKE-OVER OF THE DOMINICAN REPUBLIC. Is it any wonder that the United States Government supporte the United Nationa in cooperation with the Communist governments? : G Sas SPSL» : & The objective of the United Nations is a World Wide Socialist Dictatorship, A one-party system a, of government for the entire world, That, also, is not good. For, even if the people are allowed WZ n ra to vote, it will make no difference how they vote. The same party---the only party---shall continue fb tA - to rule, The same individuale at the top will hold the power, They will deal out to the people only 3 QOz= what they wish them to have. Freedom will disappear and tyranny shall prevail over the entire : pen world, - 4 : Q me If we are to return to the traditional American mode of government, we will have to strengthen i tA <a — ‘| #our two-party system, Then, the people will have a choice. 3 ‘ po 0 ; There are, in fact, two distinct and opposing lines of political thought. There are the misnamed =” e eo y) ‘Hberals', who would permanently establish a one-party system by supporting the type of govern- ' x» = ment we have had for the past several decades. The other principle ie that of the conservatives, { So ty oa who believe in a limited Constitutional Republic, in which the people control the government and . Kt E+ not the other way around, : "REHA I am confident that if the public can be brought to realize that our government is on its way to : becoming a one-party system, the conservatives shall recognize the danger and will take the stepa- required to bring about the necessary reform, WE MUST HAVE CONSERVATIVE CANDIDATES AND NO MATTER WHETHER THEY CALL THEMSELVES yon PUBLICAN, me OR RE MUST BE ELECTED TO OFFICE, ENCLOS 2-8 Ho6- I. ee a a ‘c-tT~d ate eBrsanmasy foe. a ma = #.. = bo] ~~ a Ohh ooh ee ne Tae — + ‘a } ACPLINDtEeG IFoM FARIS VAILT BERALUN-NEZWo, Faris,