◆ SpookStack

3? Seat eal a 4 would be argument as to whether a reargunent would be granted for the eleven defendants.) = AUSA LEON SILVERMAN applied on May 16, 1955, for =<" - adjournment of date for government filing answering papers ~~~ to motion of the eleven incarcerated defendants for =. -.- reargunent of their motion for a new trial. Judge DIMOCK’. . %~'- granted government's delay on reargument until May 19, 1955. |. On Mey 13, 1955, Dre T. C, ESSELSTYN, Staff vise an cA pole parole had been denied subject at parole boar aring held + ged | « at Alderson, West Virginia, on May , 1955, by reason of a ae CommiXO "Gravity of offense, lightness of sentence and pending detainer a | for deportation. mS aa re if a aan t tf , AUSA SILVERMAN, Southern District of New York, ~~. ° :, advised on May 26, 1955, that United States District Judge DIMOCK filed an opinion this date denying motion for reargument _ of defendants! motion for a new trial in the case entitled _ °.: SONITED STATES ws. E. G. FLYNN." The subject is one of the defendants in the above cases , HY 100-18676 et > artes - . - oe . va TE et ese ae . . . at | AUSA BAILEY advised on June 6, 1955, that Attorney ~~ MARY KAUFMAN filed an appeal by subject, CLAUDIA JONES, and others in the UNITED STATES ws. FLYNN case from the order . | of April 22, 1955, denying their motion for a new trial, end ~ from Judge DIMOCK's order of May 26, 1955, Genying their motion for rearguméent on motion for a new trial. aan AUSA BAILEY on July 5, 1955, advised that the ns appeal of the UNITED STATES vs. FLYNN defendants! from denial of moticns for reargument of their motions for a new trial remains pending. He further advised he expects defendants! attorney to file written brief on this matter during August, -. 1955, with possible argument in the Fall of 19556 _