◆ SpookStack

‘ x ccs ner eal allele ae Eee A dere cirri mn, . a aa, gas sittin nla eens IE iat tin. ae ee, eee NY 100-82752 On May 2, 1956, United States District Judge BICNS hed deni ed an application by defendants . JACKSON and CIARNMEY to allow them to ‘pRodd8d in forma pauperis and Sor an crder directing that they be . furnished with a daily stenographic transcript. United States District Judss PICKS ruled that they were not™ entitled to procéed hi.forma pauperis and he ruled ‘that defendant TRACHTENZ 3I.G pay one half the cost of a daily stenogravhi.c cranseript, the other half to be paid by the Governucr.t. On June 12, 1955, Hefense attorney CHARLES T, DUNCAN moved on Lehalf of all defendants to strike certain portions of the testimony and other evidence received during the presentation of the Govern- ment's case, This motion related to three generat categories of evidence: 1. Hearsay cGeclarations of third party intro- Guced ‘through Government witnesses e. statements made by witnesses themselves rezgarding things that they did or views they expressed 3. Documentary exhibits introduced through various Government witnesses Defense Attorney MARY M, KAUFMAN argued on June 13, 1956, that the Government had failed to establish that the defendants ' interpretation of the principles of Marxism - Leninism was the same as the interpretation given by Government witnesses and by documents in evidence. At that time Defense Attorney DUNCAN moved to strike the entire testinony of Government Wit- nesses ETHEL NC CALL and CONSUEL@ LLOYD on the ground - 35-