◆ SpookStack

| Office Menor undiin « UNITED D STATS GOVERNMENT fe. ee ‘iL Vy. ‘Boardnan Gites (oe ia BEEZ ta Lac: h Pr 8,° ement on the Findings of the | : by Councillors on Security n (White Paper), This study was the result of the Parlianentar debates in Nov. 1955 of the Burgess-Maclean case, ‘The Paper sto }\tt would not be it the public tnterest to publish full tert of the report made by théconference or to make known all its reconmendations eee the Paper. gives the substance of the report. tnsofar as tt ” * : e Nog 2 d is copy of Veo bt | ecaseren rence i published 3/8/5 ould be made public, | [Communists and || see ‘faith overrides a man's loyalty to hie own country and . induces belief that tt ts justifiable to hand over secret informa tion to a Communtst power. ‘It states the chief risks today are from. persons who are under Communist influence aa the . The risk from Communists extends to their .. . sympathizers, The chief problem of security today ta:to identify Wat keep informed of the activities of members of the British CP and ~ | ({ heir sympathizers. oe . Loot S igs} The main concluston of the conference: was that ‘there ie — ] nothing organically brong or unsound with the Governnent's-present . aor nT ts Security arrangements; however, certain recommendations are being [one to strengthen the s ystem in some respects, Buch recomnenda ti ong are as Sollows: — ae fue et 4) Departnents should be kept informed of employe xe - €2 t character defects auch as honosezruality, drunkenness, ploy atdic #40 on - or other joose living that noy asfect o man's 8 reliabiltty], © oon wee = rc. = { : ‘*) Department heads and supervisors should know Seer - ee ee Pre ey: 4 ay} ro a x hey ° + tl Ps a Ls ot a wl i atone 7a: he P| a ot 6 + L © * Oo. eh m oo % ° ¢ i> i oh i‘ aa oo a3... 3)- A serious & S10 +e é etermining factor = ince dees sion to diamiss We ployee or transfer bias ito ther wo rk, Thee 4) A Communtet should be barred fron emplounent On |}: ecret work and in some departments bei nec ~ Mitt 8 hove an ae nfavoradl e effect on his prospects of p eae ts ee an 1D) p ihe Paper referred to recommenda of the conference oi: ‘Eives and .asgoc tates “4 i J ough the (employee te nok. _ at did _not state what -the. recommendations res - ; ; Sens cine Ee ee ~ wn - _ EDPrenp"" 6). ae seb es ae | 9 employees who are Communists even “Stata oe ee eae