Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Cambridge Five Spy Ring — Part 32
Page 83
83 / 121
-
keep an eye on him, He seemed () was still sending us reams about
py that there was someone else wis
was ready to share the responsi-
bility.
In the licht of what was to come,
my decisivn to fall in with Burgess’
suggestion looks like a bad mistake.
of
T have indeed given it much thought _
in the past fifteen years. It will not
do to plead that the twist events
were to take a few months later
were utterly unforeseeable; security
precautions are designed to give
protection from the unforeseeable.
_ But, on reflection, I think that my
-decision to accommodate Burgess”
. speeded by a few. weeks at most the
thé Embassy charladies, and the
enquiry into our menial personne]
was spinning itself out endlessly.
To me, this remains the most in- —
explicable feature of the whole af-
fair. There was already evidence
that the Foreign Office had been
- penetrated. Both Krivitsky! and
. focussing of the spotlight on me, .
It also lent vigour to the letter
which Bedell-Smith sent the Chief
insisting on my removal from the
scene, It may even have been lucky ~
. that quspicion fell on me premature-
ly, in the sense that it crystallised <—
’ before the evidence was
’ enough to bring me to court.
Burgess’ arrival raised an issue
. that I could not decide by myself.
atrong
Should he or should he not be let
into the secret of the British Em- -
bassy source which was still under
investigation? The decision to ini-
tiate him was taken after I had
made two lone motor trips to points
outside Washington. I was told that
the ini
Guy’s special knowledge of the prob-
lem might be helpful. I therefore
took Guy fully into our confidence,
briefing him in the greatest detail,
_ and the subject remained under con-,
_ Stant discussion between ua. My dif-.
that 1 had only seen
ficulty ws:
Maclean tvice, and briefly, in four-
teen years. I had no idea where he ~
‘lived, how he lived, or indeed any-
Sang et ci about his circumstances.
But iv is now time to turn to the
tase, to explain how it stood, and
th. problems {t involved, = |
"Tie &:velopment of the affair was
ffivins Tus deep anxiety, It was be-
wt by iyponderables, the assess-
.tiich could be little better
fucoswork. We had received
sty
Mal
tous:
come dozen reports referring to the -
Volkov had said sc. There was, of
course, nothing to suggest that the
three sources referred to the same
man. There is still no basis for that
supposition. But if the assumption
“had been made, if in particular the .
Krivitaky material had been studied
‘in relation to the Washington leak, -
a search among the diplomats would
have started without loss of time—
"perhaps even before I appeared on ©
- the acene.
But another feature of the case
‘was even more puzzling. I must con-
fesa to having enjoyed a great ad-
vantage in that I was pretty certain
from the beginning who was in-
me
‘Oa look into his shaving-mirroy._
a4 find inspiration there. Once in-— a
vestigation of the diplomats started,” °
it would certainly yield the right |.
answer sooner or later. The great
question was: how soon? how late? =|
From discussion with my frienda
at meetings outside Washington,
two main points emerged. First, it
waa essential to rescue Maclean be-
tion was raised about his future
\ potential to the Soviet Union in the
.fore the net closed in on him. That —” ;
was accepted es an axiom. No ques- ~
“event of hia escape. It was quite .--
enough that he was an old comrade. -
. Some readers, prisoners of preju-
. dice, may find this hard to swallow,
volved. But, even discounting that -
advantage, it seemed to me quite
obvious, from the nature of the re-
* ports, that we were not dealing with
“the petty agent emptying waste-
‘ paper baskets and anatching the
balance of opinion was that |
‘odd carbon, Some of the reports
dealt with political problems of
some complexity, and on more than
one occasion Homer was spoken of
with respect. There could be no real
doubt that we were dealing with a
‘man of stature. The reluctance to
initiate enquiries along these lines
‘can only be attributed to a genuine
mental block which stubbornly re-
sisted the belief that respected
_ members of the Establishment could
_ do such things.’ The existence of
L143
'\ puch a block was amply borne out
:guree, who appeared in the docu- .
ty te under the code-name Homer,
b..., little progresa had been made ©
Aowerds identifying him. The FBI ~
by the commentaries that followed
the disappearance of Maclean and
Burgess—and for that matter, my
own. Explanations of extraordinary |
silliness were offered in preference ..
to the obvious simple truth.
Yet I knew quite well that this .
bizarre situation could not go on
forever, One day,.any day, some-
‘ body in London-.or Washington
- J was supposed to be chivvying Ger- — -
-mans in Spain. In short, our duty
I do not ask them to do so. But they
cannot blame me if they suffer un- -
- pleasant shocks in future cases. Sec- >. -
‘ond, it was desirable that Maclean -
should stay in his post as long as
possible. After his departure, it was
said blandly that he was “only”
head of the American Department _
of the Foreign Office, and thus had
little access to high-grade informa-
tion. But it is nonsense to suppose S
that a resolute and experienced op-
erator occupying a senior post in
. the Foreign Office can have access °
only to the papers that are placed
‘on his desk in the ordinary course .
of duty. I have already shown that “
I gained access to the files of Brit-
ish agents in the Soviet Union when
was to get Maclean to safety, but
’ not before it was necessary.
But there were two further com-
plications. I had been sent to the
United States for a two-year tour
of duty, and I could therefore ex-
“pect to be replaced in the autumn
~
” 1Soviet intelligence officer Walter Kri- -
, Vitaky defected to the West in 1940,
bringing with him secret information
about an unidentified Soviet agent in
~ Britain's Foreign Office —Ede.
of 1951. I had no idea what my next
_ ‘posting would be; it could easily
have been Cairo or Bingapore, far’ -
‘out of touch with the Maclean case. —
Groping in partie] darknesa as we |
'. were, it seemed safest to get Mac- —
lean away by the middle of 1951 at
: the latest. The second complication © |
arose from Burgess’: position. He
was emphatically not at home in
the Foreign Office, for which he
had neither the right temperament
nor the right personality. He had
been ‘thinking for some time of get-
ot wet
a
.
1
her
eee
Se ce ee es ne ed.
wh ee eee ee
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic