Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Cambridge Five Spy Ring — Part 13
Page 31
31 / 86
Mr.. Resa.
Mr. Tanen
Mr, Sin
mathe . BMa. Wirisgr awd
Tele. Room
Mr. Holluoan ..
Gandy _
i
ra
[/MP.|NAMES “THIRD MAN? IN” |
j_BURGESS-MACLEAN CASE | 5 1
'No Select Committee but Early Debate : ,
© Sir Anthony Eden, Prime Minister. p.|. 007 reas ae a ly
said in the House of Commons | ©4P lanation Sought eof Lois an an ‘
yesterday that he would not appoi ord Elion asked in the Hous
¥ . : ‘ fe
a Select Committee to investigate | sta, soreness Government's
the disappearance of the two dip! 1s ber 28, 1052, thet, “Mr 2 Wsclean per-: 2
matists, Burgess’ and Maclean, and| formed his‘ o tial dudes satisfactorily up a
5 sy best : to the date of his disappearance,” and that
the efficiency of the Civil Service “we knew Mr Maclean's background, bis .
agcurity arfangements ,in general. distinguished career in the Foreign Office. 4
ov ent’s view was that it} up te that time, and t ere was no reason .
was desirable to have an early debate| ' entertain any suspicion of him.” C~ \
‘ . - : Lord Heading, Minister of State to the | y
on this-subject, and one in which he, Forel hi lied: “TH
i ect oreign Office, replied ; @ question to /
as Prime Minister, would be glad to Which I was replying ras directed solely S
take part fs and specifically ta Mr Maclean's suitability
: io be appointed head of the American
jeutenant-Colonel M, Lipton (Lab. Departmeer ot aa Foreign Office. That.
Byxton), who had asked whether als peiniment was made in October, 1950,
Saect Committee would be appointed, | which was, therefore, the material date so
thf asked: “Have you made up your oder the nestion was concerned. Atl ,
md to cover up at all cosis the dubjous| that time Mr Maclean. Was under no _ ee
third man activities of Mr Harold| #4spicion of being either a Coramunist or » , PW
Philby, who was First Secretary of the | ® “Mr Maclean ‘did not disappear until i he
Washington Embassy a little while 4807|May, 1951 I said in fiy reply: ‘It is ,
Are you determined to stifle all discus- now known that on more than e
sion of the grave matters evaded in the | ocgaston before his disappearance Wr
wretched White Paper, which was an|Mdclean made remarks suggesting tHat
insult to the intelligence of the|h4 was a Communist or sympathetic [to
country? . fofimiunism,’ and then I added these very rae
Sir Anthony; I said “No” to the ques- tne time his i spointinent Tene ee at .
wir Anthony: I sq q - ime of his appointment. at state. attendee)
tion which asked for a Select Committee. | ment end also “the ,further statement NOT RECO RASH
My answer remains “Wo.” So far as the quoted in the present ‘question that, ‘we 4a _
wider issues raised in the supplementary | Knew. Mr Maclean's background, we knew a Roy id Le iedg
question are concerned, the Government | his distinguished career in the Foreign aes i
take the view that it is desirable to have | Office up to that time and there was no
a debate, an early debate, on this subject reason to entertain any suspicion of him:
‘jand one in which 1, as Prime Minister, both have direct and exclusive reference EES orp oo, ~
shall be glad to take part. flo the point of time in October, 1950, ies
Mr A, obens (Lab, Blyth): Have you when he was apphinted to the Amerizan
made any investigation of’ the reason why | Department, ‘and: both. are completely
briets. supplied by Foreign Office officials | accurate. ne fo,
{4 Ministers answering questions in this| “The statement that ‘Mr’ Maclean
use have been so much at variance wilh Derformed his official duties satisfactorily he
facts of the case ? vo up to the date of his disappearance’ must :
ir Anthony: That seems one of the [be read in ¢ ® proper context of his f
tters whieh might well be raised in 5 suitability for art eeent aS head of the 3
ate, Des merican ment, the poin OY
Se ml ae _— {question with which I was ddating. * was elon
x “re explaining the circumstances in which he
* CASE had been given a further trial in a fresh
. appointment and. in (ubport ots that
i 00. ’ ecision. I ¢ @ fac at he had per.
( le 1 3 74183 ) f rmed his official duties—cleariy mea hing:
his new oficial duties a pend ot he,
— erican Department—satisfactor: up . .
THE MANCHESTER GUARDIAN iq the, Sate of his disappearance, Ang 30
Loubeat ee oe | Lord Elton ’said be could not heDEe Gel) COPY SENT OC. BR. Prac Komallal
MN N ‘ i cn i - “a
+ —_ in mee 5 bas ras ‘
Vip OFTHE LSGAL ATTACHE BY LETTER JUN 2219/8.
JN ft ¥ Ethel CE STN OS a pm ~ wey . ;
yd N ni 14 ~ woe mien. TEMBASSY, | PER FOIA Riguas, . a ,
‘a ee RE Ltd ae ok eee :
5 he EM 3 at ee iy ENGLAND, 6) ra ” . i)
~ :
amo mo * oo a
* . _ » my noo
- A . ~~ ee
ie a ge 5 a wa ys vob RRs
oe : a
it ~ }
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic