◆ SpookStack

art go 2 ae * Accurate’? ord Reading .sald thet the orifinal question was directed soOFiv to Maclean's suitability te he appointed head -of the Foreign Office's -Amerlean Department in October: 1950—when he was in fset not under suspicion as & spy. The reply was therefore “ com~ Pletely accurate,” . fe had been “IT was explainin stances in which given @ further trial in a appointment," Lo the ctreum-|- Mayfair flat about, her freshishe sald: ‘mother, and I am as fond of -. ia ! SAYS HIS Express Staff Reporter HE mother of Guy" T Colonel Jack Basse Son, tapped & cigarette AS she Etp- “Tam still Ais sited tePpre, Of that decision nim now as I ever wos 1 have I cited the fact that he had per. 5 formed his officiai duties——clearly to telemeed and I would like meaning his new official duties as head of the American Department 7 S#tistactorily up to the date of his disappearance. And: so he did." to teli him so. T allegations are all “They are Sacked from ‘ les, Dartmouth Naval think these)fed that saying he wasid No THIER, ‘MOTHER. SUIBESS, HOw wife of Lieut il, talked “last ni ed night in he | DELIGHTED” -** { sne put out thin, velned hands. n_ them was a letter from the foiain of the college. . It said i— “Dear Mrs. Burgess, Fam satis. Guy's evesight. must be Great disappointment, if he oes not take to the idea of engi-! neering or paymaster, J ¢an only; 4 id that College because he was & thief, Iththing yOu Would be Wise to send} wontee suspett stor Reading of Just isn’t true,” epy, {DIM back to Eton. ee [deliberately misleading the House | Guy's Steptather put in: “They!” 4 Actually, tt ts better for him but} he fel “a bis purged" by canted alfed him a spy: , They have *, t be boarded out now than Bay thid reply. .. pealte moa braltor, < a ie jn three or four years’ time, when]. . en ata F & Ww more definitely com- Satisfied’. | °° * ONLY HE— mitted to the Navy". © - oe . “ “Now they call nim a thier. [Guy Burgess went wip Dart- pound pete, he whether nets None of it is true.” He Waved/mouth jrom Eton in January part be other officials who wre| is | hands in | anger" His 1525. He wos then 13). He stayed Derforming their official duties inf Mother and I don’t know, Youjaz Dartmouth eight” terms. and & similarly satisfactory manner.”| ¢eftainly don't know. . Lord. Reading: “T knew at the time I made the answer—of Course T did, for theré is no ques- tion of the department holding anyiting back from me—that Mr. Maclean had been under. observa: tion. It was nob relevant to the question asked. “I was satisfied that tt was not the public interest to disclose in T feel about him to get letters to him Prime “Minister Thelle/t in Jul 1927 to himself doesn't Ek : ¥ nae al 1 o back to on} know, » Nobody OWS “except © F : In the ‘expensive Bassett flat!"T am most awfully sorry te ar| there was silence, ' of the way your eareer in ithe Mrs. Bassett sighad, then said: V¥ has: been made. imposgible “I would like Guy to know how + Jt is impogsibie . ; , d f IN Leaman GTON “ British Guy has written.” -; ; pokesman said that Sir Roger (Burgess wrote to his mother at aking “eonsiders that any Christmas 1954. and aoain at larification or ampilfcation Of Christma rd Reading's statement must sought from the Porelgn fice," ; 5 or tenet . o esent,” said his mother.) Taut with grief she stoke atout| & Dartmouth incident. “I khow Wasivt thies,” he. sald ; | & last year, “2 contd 10 ve had a” nicer eyes + but every; Y#u back again.” 7 has been r YOur eyesight, “i shall be delighted’ to fave