Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Bugsy Siegel — Part 4
Page 36
36 / 65
_ 2. | MEMORANDUM FOR THE DIRECTOR: oa 7 August 26, 1946
him that I €id not believe that was the case, that in any court proceeding
by analysing the facts presented by the Government and those presented by
the defense you can obtain the reasons for a decision.
then reverted back to the theory that the matter was highly
tehonical. I n asked him why the stop order was sent to the builders
of the Flamingo Hotel, and he said that was based on investigation oon-
- ro 4 - aoe Pl tn hel
ducted by the Compliance Division of the ¢.P.A. which had been furnished
to the Washington headquarters of the C.P.A., who had issued the stop
order. J asked him in view of the fact that this investigation had been
conducted if they were not in a position at that time to present a case }
before the commissioner which would wphold the contention of the Govern- 2c
ment, and he stated that they were supposed to be in a position to do that
but sometimes they were caught short on a stop order and they do not have
enough evidence to present. He said that he felt that if the F.B.I.
conducted an investigation of this matter at this time it would harm
the investieeation of the C,P A T esbaead him how tt eeutd hae the op
td eS wai wel sie Bh MBE CE A Oe Ce ee oe oA.
investigation, and he said he did not kmow. I then advised him that I
did n that our investigation would interfere with the C.P.A,
case. WME oer 03 about swarms of agents out investigating this
7 matter ad been duplicating the C.P.A. investigation and said that
the builders of the Flamingo Hotel would came up to the hearing with
— high-price lawyers and technical experts. I asked him if the builders
of the Flamingo Hotel were not already on notice that his organization
was conducting an investigation, and he admitted that they had already
appeared at the first hearing with hizgh-price lawyers and technical assistants.
then proposed that we hold off our investigation until
after the C.F.A. hearing September Sth. He said that if both the C.P.A.
and the F.B.I, investigate this matter we might both fail, but that if
C.P.A. alone investigates it the chance of C.P.A. failing is less. pe
However, he stated that if the C.P.A. fails to make its case then they
will turn the matter over to us. JI told him that he himself stated that
we would be going over the same investigation, and I pointed out that
if that is true that if the C.P.A. fails then the F.B.1. fails. He ade
mitted that thia was true,
The only thing nat Fe: reveal as to the future
investigation of the C.P.A. was they plamed to take photographs of
the work as it now stands on the Flamingo Hotel and to try te get tech- pr
nical assistance. He said that they might not be able to get this tech-
nical assistance and then he did not know what the results of their case
might be. He said that they thought they might try to get additional
plans used by the construction company.
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic