◆ SpookStack

a as * a CE 157-6171 AVANT, "Prior to the progress report, Bro. Brown, along with some other brothers, tried to talk to Brother Matthews to warn him that such incidents would cause student divisions. Unfortunately, Brother | Matthews was emotionally up_set at that time, The brothers could not come to an agreement. "When Matthews addressed the student rally that evening, citing the cafeteria incident, he asked for ! all radicals to stand. After no one stood Brother Lae 1: Brown attempted to get the floor, He was pointed out as a ‘radical’ at that time. "On Friday, Dec. 13th Bro following letter: "*'Dear Mr. Brown **¥You have been charged with a very serious infraction of regulations and standards of the University. Specifically, you are charged with defacing property of the University and disorderly conduct. Especially is your case a very serious one because of a deliberateness taken on your part to insight others to follow your actions. You have been summoned to this office for a hearing to face these charges and to receive judgement as the facts in the Jf nasm dictate Leo wit LG. € a ~. "'Very Sincerely yours J. E. Marshall Dean of Student Affairs' "On the following Tuesday a so~called hearing took place. Although Bro. Brown had 155 witnesses to prove his innocence, two hand-picked students and kangaroo procedures found him guilty. "THESE FACTS SHOULD SPEAK FOR THEMSELVES! ii iitiioiis advised that on tle Dir Was neia reneboro, North We Mm g was persons and the instructor was HARCLD mself as a Section Chief and teacher of the BPP. This was one of a group of weekly training sessions to be presented for new BPP members. ERIC BROWN was identified as =jl4= 5" =. a a : -_———— —.. _ . oe Faw 7 Cm ae - a Pole a . ure wee wee rn a ee ee a rs 1 ~~" 17 - . . ™~ : + a ae fe ” we NO ee er we ee hens a ae ed . 5 te et at aie a at Sy wee oe ee . 7. *. ~ — he *. , ae * - —_o an _ * — en nee TE Se cured SA RRM MN re wre STEER ore