◆ SpookStack

rad @ @ FD-302a (Rev. 10-6-95) 279A-WF-222936-302 listed on the subpoena or how they were served notice of the subpoena, nor did ecall_how long it took USAMRIID to comply with the subpoena request. reiterated there should ha been no confusion on how to prepar affirmed would be "surprised" if IVINS was unable to prepare further advised IVINS was "usually very accurate. [ ____Jstates "if anybody at USAMRIID [perpetrated the anthrax-lace etter mailings of 2001], it would have been IVINS." continued "only [IVINS] had the setup to produce_the quantity of spores that were used in those letters." concluded that IVINS, with a starting concentration of 2 x 10" spores/flask and eight (8) one liter (1) flasks per hot water bath/shaker, would of needed twenty-five (25) runs to produce the quantity of spores used in the mailings. (Ae ea cfirned it would not be unusual for the hot water bath/shaker to be in use in the [ hot suite. TSS a (WFO NOTE: enclosed in the FD-340 associated with this communication is an email dated June 21, 2005, with the subject £ "Hot News!" that[_]was provided for review as well as bre above captioned calculations.) ~ when told that IVINS had 1 "T don't believe he responded authored the provided email. did this," and "amazing." could not recall the USAMRIID source for the Bacillus anthracis used if however, opined it was not from IVINS. advised thatL__————idpointed out early on to [that spores did not look the same as the evidence and this was in contrast to what IVINS was saying in the email. and that the results indicated it_ is impossible to say that the was Similar to that of the ecause "concentration" is a function "concentration" of anthrax used in the mailings