◆ SpookStack

to.a different conclusion than the wun here. Nevertheless, we cannot say that there was insufficient evidence to support the jury's verdict. Accordingly, we affirm Rosario's conviction. Rosaris's statements to Rios served to deceive him into believing that she had unwittingly passed the forged check. After all, it certainly served Rosario's interests for Rios to believe the check transaction was legitimate because Rios may have been less willing to cash the check had he known it was stolen. 10 NYGAARD, Circuit Judge, dissenting. The government argues that the combination of wholly ambiguous testimony from a handwriting expert and equivocal testimony from a witness receiving favorable treatment from the government is sufficient to support the conviction of Altigraci Rosario for passing a United States Treasury check. The majority accepts this argument. | do not; hence, | dissent. To convict Rosario of check forgery under 18 U.S.C. § 510(a)(2), the government was required to prove four elements beyond a reasonable doubt: (1) that the check http://vls.law.vill.edu/locator/3d/July1 997/97a1636p.htm - Page 17 of 29 5/10/2005