◆ SpookStack

FD-302a (Rev. 10-6-95) ~1 oN oO ooo 279A-WF-222936-BEI Continuation of FD-302 of a On 05/28/2008 ,Page 4 provide along with thi iagram and was peating the information that was provided to by IVINS. a copy of photographs of[ | [A copy of the photos_will be t A along with the interview notes.] indicated a didn't believe that d seen the photos before, but wasn't _certain of this. was not sure who may have seen the photos. remembered hearing about the morphological variants observed in the Ba_used_ in the mailings through the grapevine.[___| believed that[ talked about the observations made_in the evidence with others around to include IVINS. recalled conversations hetweenl and IVINS regarding the morphological variants found in the evidentiary spore material. someone were sample for the FBIR the same individual would have also prepared the label for the tube that IVINS is a good researcher. opined that any decent microbiologist would not make a mistake in preparing a sample for the FBIR that would not be representative of the sample. IVINS asked[ _if his samples had morphological s similar to the ones present in the evidentiary material. never grew out RMR-1029 (Dugway spores) out to observe the morphological variants in order to compare these spores to the evidentiary material. FBIR samples were coded so didn't know which samples were submitted by which researchers.