Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Amerithrax — Part 3
Page 40
40 / 151
vaccine was safe. Nevertheless, what the government then did not do was telling. The
FDA never licensed the vaccine, or the oi] adjuvant, for human use.
The Fort Dix experiment was the first time Army doctors and scientists injected an oil-
boosted vaccine into U.S. troops without informed consent; there is now clinical evidence
that it was far from the last. For more than a half century, factions in military medicine
and in the U.S. public health establishment have actively campaigned to get an oily
vaccine additive licensed, seemingly at any cost.
The Emperor's New Clothes
When scientists at Fort Detrick, following Joe Jemski's 1992 talk, reviewed the existing
literature on the Wright vaccine, it didn't look good. Even with 6 shots, the vaccine did
not protect very well. Guinea pigs vaccinated with the licensed human vaccine died when
exposed to certain strains of anthrax. In 1986 the bad news got worse. In discovering that
the licensed vaccine protected against the Army's old weapons strain, Vollum - from
which the vaccine had been derived - Stephen Little and Gregory Knudson also
discovered 8 more-anthrax strains for which the PA vaccine did not work. Among them
was the now notorious Ames strain that was mailed in 2001 anthrax letter attacks. Like
the Army's previous research, the data confirmed that a live spore vaccine provided better
protection against more strains. "The fact that the spore vaccine provided protection
against all isolates tested suggests that other antigens may play a role in active
immunity," they concluded. Which would argue for a live anthrax vaccine, but Fort
Detrick's scientists expressed an age old concern about problem with living vaccines that
could be traced all the way back to Pasteur: "Since this vaccine is a live immunogen,"
they warned, "safety factors must be considered before its use." Little and Knudson did
not rule out the possibility of resorting to a live spore vaccine, but that is not what they
then chose to pursue.
When they, along with Fort Detrick scientists Bruce Ivins and Sue Welkos, began
working on a new anthrax vaccine, they chose a design that was all the rage at the
NJH—subunit plus adjuvant. "Subunit" refers to small fragments of a germ. For safety,
NIH scientists were using subunits of lethal viruses like HIV to be the chief component of
their new generation of genetically engineered vaccines. These ultra-pure vaccines, which
reduced an immunization to mere molecules from a microbe, were safe, but at a price.
They were weak. In some cases, they afforded no detectable level of protection at all. This
is why the NIH wanted an adjuvant more robust than alum for its new vaccines.
The subunit that Little, Knudson, Ivins and Welkos chose for the Army's new anthrax
vaccine was a little surprising. It was protective antigen—the same main ingredient in the
vaccine they were trying to replace. Although all the data from both U.S. and British
military experiments from the 60's forward indicated that more components of the anthrax
microbe needed to be in any effective anthrax vaccine—a fact that even Little and
Knudson acknowledge in their 1986 paper—Fort Detrick's newest generation of anthrax
investigators did just the opposite. In fact, they did one better. With recombinant DNA
technology, their new vaccine would eliminate every extra molecule of anthrax unrelated
to protective antigen. It would be purest PA formulation ever made, and would hence be
the weakest anthrax vaccine ever made. Remember, in immunology, purity equals
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Reader
Topic
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
investigation
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic