Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
American Friends Service Committee — Part 28
Page 102
102 / 149
a aan
persistence in position and persistence in negotiation. To
remain intransigent in position destroys the very nature
of negotiation, and usually ends in terminating the nego-
tiation which, in turn, encourages trial by strength.
6 Negotiation requires recoguizing that opposite interests
may be genuinely and deeply felt, even though particu-
lar controversies arising during the negotiating process
may be exaggerated by the negotiators. Many who have
listened to Russian and American spokesmen in the assem-
blies of the United Nations have often wished that the
defamatory words of the speech-makers could be deleted
. so that only the issue itself would appear. Stinging charges
of insincerity never helped to settle any argument nor to
clarify the points at issue.
7. Negotiation requires privacy. Ie cannot be carried on
in a goldfish bowl or in a theatre where the actors are
rempted to overact their parts. Irresponsible publicity,
tip-offs, and trying the case in the newspapers for “effect”
invariably handicap negotiation,
There are those who will insist chat negotiation between
the Soviet Union and the United States is irapossible. Surely,
increasing suspicion and lack of confidence on both sides ren-
der negotiation increasingly difficult. Yet, agreements must be
made, and it is far better for them to be made before a third
world war than afterward.
Strengthening International The role to be played by the
Peacemaking Functions United Nations and other in-
ternational organizations in a
world deeply divided by ideological differences and heavily
armed is more and more phrased in terms of negotiation vs.
power, peace vs. war, In terms of basic plan the United Nations
Charter is a great step forward from the League of Nations
Covenant. The League put the emphasis on measures to delay
the outbreak of hostilities. The United Nations Charter empha~-
sizes peaceful settlement of disputes and creates a means for
common action against social and economic problems which
can develop into political conflicts. It is worthwhile to repeat
the Preamble of the Charter of the United Nations:
42
We the people of the United Natious determined to
save succeeding generations from the scourge of war,
which twice in our lifetime has brought untold sorrow
to mankind and to reafhirm faith in fundamental
human rights, in the dignity and worth of the human
person, in the equal rights of men and women and of
nations large and small, and to establish conditions
under which justice and respece for the obligations
arising from treaties and other sources of interna-
tional law can be maintained, and to promote social
Progress and better standards of life in larger free-
dom, and for these ends to practice tolerance and live
together in peace with one another as good neighbors,
and to unite our strength to maintain international
peace and security, and to ensure, by the acceptance
of principles and the institution of methods, char
armed force shall not be used, save in the commoa in-
terest, and to employ international machinery for
the promotion of the economic and social advance-
ment of all peoples, bave resolved to combine our
efforts ta accomplish these ainss,
But the “collective measures” provision, which was intended
as a minor function of the United Nations, has, by events,
been altered out of all proportion to its original intent. It was
expected at the founding of the United Nations that nations
would disarm, thac a police force could then be established, thar
the Great Powers would remain in substantial agreement, that
collective action would never be used againse any of the Great
Powers (since that would be on a scale of “war’) and this
would be assured by the “veto.” The police force in an un-
armed world and under laws and restrictions would deter any
other country from seciling its disputes by military means,
But over the last seven years a very different alternative has
developed. The nations have not disarmed; the Great Powers
have not remained in agreement but are engaged in an unprece-
dented power struggle; the de facto government of one of the
Great Powers stipulated in the Charter (China) is unrecog-
nized and banned from membership in the United Nations;
the veto has been by-passed by referring collective measures
43
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
federal bureau
letter
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic