Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
American Friends Service Committee — Part 10
Page 37
37 / 140
laid out by the Republic of Vietnam durin
54 PEACE = JVIETNAN
be barred from all negotiation, since it is “only an instrumery
created by the Communist North Vietnamese.” The Ieafict alse
declared that negotiations could take place only after “precondi
tions (such as the withdrawal of Communist troops and cadres’
g eventual preliminary
=
me owt een eeoted and carried ott.” This withdraws
talks will have been accepiea and Carried out. This wit!
was further specified as meaning “previous withdrawal of the Vict
cong armed units and political cadres” as well as those of ths
North Vietnamese. This amounted to a denial of the President’
offer of “unconditional” discussions.
A senior North Vietnamese diplomat announeed that, sinc
major North Vietnamese objectives are reunification ard neutral
ization of Vietnam, withdrawal of United States forces and :
coalition government in South Vietnam were essential to am
settlement, and therefore negotiations on President Johnsen’
terms would amount to surrender.?4 On April 8, 1965, Premie
Pham Van Dong of the Democratic Republic (North Vietnam.
stated the Four Points, to be discussed below, as the basis o1
which it would agree to a Geneva-type conference for negotiatin;
a peace settlement.
The National Liberation Front’s negotiating position, which ha
hardened in March as soon as the first United States Marine
landed in South Vietnam, was now matched by a hardening o
North Vietnam’s position as indicated by Hanoi’s refusal to re
ceive U Thant or, finally, even letters from him.*? North Vietnan
also refused to receive British missions to explore the possibilit
of negotiations. Even if the United States’ negotiating position
were to become clear and reasonably satisfactory to North Viet
nam, Hanoi was not likely to agree to negotiate while Unite:
States bombings continued.
In mid-May, hard-pressed by critics at home and abroad, th
United States halted its bombing of North Vietnam. It was late
revealed *4 that Secretary of State Rusk transmitted a sccret mes
sage to Hanoi at this time through the North Vietnamese Embass
in Moscow. The message stated that the bombing suspension cou),
= New York Times, April 10, 1965.
™Drew Middleton, New York Times, December 3, 1965,
® Editorial, New York Times, December 30, 1965.
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
federal bureau
letter
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic