Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
American Friends Service Committee — Part 4
Page 64
64 / 108
‘)
(The above is based partly on Walker, Organizing for
Nonviolent Direct Action.)
Police policy varies rather widely from state to
state, within states from city to city, and even within
cities from time to time. It varies from states in
which conferences of police officials hear represen~
tatives of civil rights and peace groups explain their
policies, to states where there is no communication,
much less understanding, between demonstrators and
police officials.
gaged in by units of the State and National Guard.
Federal troops have been used in only a few cases,
notably Little Rock and the University of Mississippi.
Civil rights workers will want to remember that in the
latter case Negro troops were systematically excluded
from duty at the University, resulting in considerable
unrest and, according to a confidential informant, a
near mutiny at one point. As individuals, Federal troops
generally will tend to be friendly to the civil rights
movement partly because of the nature of their duty,
partly because of their racial composition, and partly
because they resent local hostility which is aimed at
80.
them by segregationists. On the other hand, there is
little reason to hope that the simple presence of Fed-
eral troops will necessarily change the local situation;
more likely the situation will only be "frozen" at its
present point, and all demonstrations (including by civil
rights groups) banned. Local resentment at Federal
“occupation” may in fact be turned against local move-
ments once Federal protection is removed.
Alabama and Mississippi
"Tough" policing of civil rights generally falls
into two types: the "Alabama System" and the "Mis-
sissippi System." The former involves the lack of
police protection for legitimate demonstrations ~- it
permits the formation of mobs, as in the case of the
Freedom Riders in 1961. The latter system forbids
the formation of mobs, and uses police authority to
crush civil rights demonstrations. This has the advan-
lave of being not only more efficient, but also proceeding
under the protection of "law and order." While Northern
police do not use the "Alabama System," it should not be
thought that they never use the Mississippi System.
There are at least two variations upon this system --
the straight-forward, “hard" line: disperse, or else.
Period. The other variation appears seft on the sur-
face and attempts to disarm, psychologicaliy, the
leauership and rank-and-file by beieg puiite furst, and
only later pulling off the scft gloves. For example the
at
ey
ce eee ee
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
federal bureau
letter
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic