◆ SpookStack

prurient interest. For those who would seek to pander materials such ap those libelled in this case, I need hardly express ny contempt. Nor need I add that the theory of this Gecision, rightly interpreted, affords no comfort to those who would import materials such as these for public sale or private indulgence. The ery againat the circulation of obscenity raised by the law-abiding community is a legitimate one; and one with which Congress, the State legislatures, and the courte have been seriously concerned. When that case arises in which the Government determines that it should go to trial upon the facts, a showing that multiple copies of a particular piece of matter are sought to be imported by the same person 44 The Government also maintains that the holding in United States v. One dtscene Book Entitled "Married Love," . 2 «DN.Y. @ Gecision t & booxn Is importable under $295(a) 18 res judicata in a subsequent libel, precludes my holding Tet aeteste is to be judged Joby its appeai to those who will see it. But the successive importations in that case were both for the purpose of dig- tributing the bock to the public at large. I see no reason for extending the rationale of the cited case beyond the situation in which the successive importaticns are for the: purpose of distributing the material to the same ptérgon or class of persons. , 42 See Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476, 485 (1957).