◆ SpookStack

% 40 29.2 ~ “Late Ubie af cers: ene cf the jJorore Sas Ga’ mt the trial cf tt ef <a -.spticzced matter Came 10%5 wy eitace and proffer. i certain rzfcrmation relative to what the jery Bad < aescered during dts deliberations. t "B- Leoat- 3s B&B ac+s v. ARSE ZPILiBAS Wroe- re: Shi. JEN BFE ic: “Firet cf aii, et are advised that the fina: wete of the jury Wan sever Ser eoaviction and fi. for acquitta:. Tre jurcr steted that in the beginziag ~ it was aizs-to-six ari after several hourt wert to " peven-te-five, which it remained threughout the . remainder ef the jury's deliberations. As stated ex Aja my previous Letter to pou qa ted March 3, 1956, the | i. ae soe Lt ¥ r "4h wo come is ‘ee eer a, ‘ althougt he K+ along with aix etiera reted far oerriction, meverthe- “]' Jess stated that “sll 2 were quite perisusly concerned. @ith the fact Chat the Gevernasat’s favestigation ia thers er price ete Hin hat weether oe: a. of ta @ geabt ether OF 7 Sees te eZ oe Dey Fier Baatatae a“ ail 2h Ls He “wndertoek wc @xariztatico or niueastigetion te o sternite j-fibether or net the ft. werth statemests were accurate ‘gm the sense that go eee ant prior years was - | absertaben te Gelergiss. was ok pit the dofeedsat. 15h 7. qed bie wife bed tf lable da addttios te ae ”“daees set Lertd fn the net worth statements. 3x 6 Fats ether words the Jurcra felt that the not wortd state- . o8jA @ents migtt mot bare include. all assets and at ie ¥) sonsequently the dcabt they Bad ec. aot be py resolved because th: G:vernment failed to addue sa a@rs evidence pc t- ftrenria’ circumstances i: prior ’ PATS. 3 "Yr, ath faire: s *- the special agent 21 sbould =F expressly be piap +d <4. thas. this case Ga arvesti- x: pated by Inte: ce. Fovens atid presenrret * tie Uranc # ‘eS SF 2 i