Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
DoJReportOnCIAMailOpening
Page 25
25 / 57
. -
e
...
Approved For Release 2008/11/06: CIA-RDP04M01816R000502010009-4
- 25 -
itself opens envelopes when necessary to ascertain the address
of the intended recipient.
Indeed, unless there were an
"authorized opening" exception, a law enforcement official who
opened mail pursuant to a judicial warrant would violate the
statute.8/
See United States v. Van Leeuwen, 397 U.S. 249 (1970).
The Department of Justice consequentlybel!eves that the actions
of the CIA in opening mail also would not violate section 1702,
if those actions were properly authorized.9/
8/
An 1882 decision interpreting a statutory predecessor
to section 1702 stated that "one is punishable who wrongfully,
without any authority of law, or pretence of authority," inter-
feres with the mail.
United States v. Mccready, 11 Fed. 225,
236 (W.D. Tenn. 1882).
9/
Neither section 1702 nor any other statute purports to
take from. the President, and the Executive Branch in general,
any preexisting power to open and examine mail when necessary
to the discharge of the President's constitutional responsibility
for foreign affairs.
Cf. United States v. Butenko, 494 F.2d. 593
(3rd Circ.) (en banc),~ertiorari denied, 419 U.S. 881 (1974),
which holds tnat~anaiogous statute, although containing a
broadly stated prohibition, does not affect presidential power to
authorize surveillance when the Constitution otherwise permits it.
One other statute, 39 U.S.C. §3623(d), might be considered
to do so.
That statute forbids the opening of domestic first-
class mail without a warrant.
Nothing in the legislative history
of section 3623(d) indicates that it was designed to affect the
power of the President concerning foreign affairs. See,~·, H.R.
Conf. Rep. No. 91-1363, 91st Cong., 2d Sess. 88 (1970).
Although section 3623(d) originated in the Espionage Act of 1917,
40 Stat. 230, it then contained only a statement that the Act did
not affirmatively autborize. the open:mg <:,f mail. M:lreover. it applies only
to letters of "domestic origin," and so would not affect the open-
ing of mail entering the United States froo abroad.
Finally,
(continued on following page)
A
roved For Release 2008/11/06: CIA-RDP04M01816R000502010009-4
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic