◆ SpookStack

I have your letter of 21 February 1955 r^The -= infor--—fr:-'—- -^ mation contained therein is perfectly clear, and I will fol- / : low your instructions in the future. I have a question with reference to Xtein^ Nov^4^ Am " ' I to understand that I should not use my own name in future correspondence? IddnVt see how the use of my own name can be avoided when vouchers and similar" items are subraitted-in ^=. the future. Moreover, as I indicated in a recent telephone con- versation, I have a problem with reference, to one of my Judges. I made casual mention of this situation"when you visited me in my office some time^agoy but I would like to outline the situation in some detail in a letter to you. Since a question of clearance for this particular Judge wil l be involved, it will be necessary that I give you his full name. If future communications to me are to be sent Regis- tered Mail, I would fadviseTisending them to my office as you did on this occasion, rather than to my home. Very often = there is no one at my home during one daytime hours, and if letters were sent there i t~would b;> necessary .that -I pick them up at the Post Office, so please write to me at my of- fice address. As soon as you respond to this letter, I “will write you at some length on matters of mutual interest. A MM Mt < 1 V r «FA1 I M A