Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
CIA RDP96 00792r000300020002 1
Page 55
55 / 57
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000300020002-1
LN465-92
conclusion is that before the spin of the second particle is observed, it
cannot be determined, and it is not real.
As Nash sees it, the first of these two possibile conclusions, the
long range effect, could be seen as the same thing as PSI. Following the
same train of thought, the British Physicist C. WN. Villars further
proposed the hypothesis that the long range effect between these two
particles could be used to explain extra sensory perception. One of thee
particles in the brain of the sensor, and the other particle would serve
as the target object. He believed that a chain of interacting particles
connected the different members of ai pair of formerly connected
microphysics particles.
OBSERVATION THEORY
As stated above, the second conclusion of Clauser and Shimony, which
was that prior to being observed, the physical nature of this particle
dces not exist. The observation theories of PSI are consistent with this.
The observation theories are based on the theories of quantum mechanics.
The theories of quantum mechanics hold that a physics system (such as an
atom) has countless states expanding in space, forming one called the PSI
(not to be confused with the PSI of PSI theory) wave function. This
particle does not exist in one of its states only, but exists
Simultaneously in all of its states. When the physics system is tested,
or when this particle is observed, its wave function shrinks from all of
the states of which it consists into a single state. It is only at this
time that it exists in a certain location in space. According to the PSI
observation theory, in the brain or a _ target object, a particle wave
function, under the process of observation, shrinks into a certain state
until these states are the same.
At the present time, there are several variable phase observation
theories. The first was proposed by American Physicist Evan Harris
Walker. He united the complex consciousness of he observer toward the
physics system and several the hidden variables some quantum physicists
believe cause the shrinking of the wave functions. Because the hidden
variables are independent in space and time, the observer can cause the
wave functions of these particles separated by time and space to shrink,
thus causing their uniformity. This provides an explanation for
simultaneous extrasensory perception, precognition and PK. Copenhagen
University’s Richard Mottuch has proposed that it is not necessary to
select a hidden variable, that the consciousness of the observer will
change their distribution and cause the wave functions to shrink at will.
Another variable phase observation theory is that proposed by Helmut
Schmidt. He hypothesized that a PSI acted to influence the probability of
the occurrence of an event through a psisource. Similar to this is the
hypothesis by Australian Physicists James Donald and Brian Martin of the
existence of energy or negative entropy in the direction of the past that
could be used in the future to alter the probability of events occurring
in the present.
D6
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000300020002-1
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic