Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
CIA RDP96 00788r000100330001 5
Page 88
88 / 88
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000100330001-5
THE NATION
° ‘
Terrorism 138
resident Reagan’s contribution to statecraft has
been to make public policy of what used to be
secret suggestion. He stripped the cover from covert
war and entered aid to the Nicaraguan contras as
a line item in the Congressional budget. He wanted to con-
vert the shadowy C.I.A. system of subversion and propa-
ganda into a proud executive operation, Project Democ-
racy. Far from denying U.S. intentions to destabilize foreign
regimes, he announced a campaign to bring the Sandinista
government to its knees. It was not long ago that similar ac-
tions by another President became part of impeachment
proceedings.
In an order signed April 3, Reagan gave state-sponsored
terrorism the force of law, where once it was hardly whis-
pered about in White House corridors. National Security
Decision Directive 138 will allow U.S. government opera-
tives to take what Secretary of State Shultz calls ‘‘preventive
or pre-emptive action’? against foreign terrorist threats.
Although the President has revealed no specifics on what
the program might entail, he will soon ask Congress to
authorize large sums to finance it. According to an Admin-
istration source, the White House has at least one thing in
mind: a bulging bribery account, from which inform-
ers will be paid huge rewards —perhaps $500,000—for the
juiciest tips.
Whether called state terrorism or pre-emptive action, the
kinds of operations the directive sanctions will be ruthless,
arbitrary and dangerous. If an eager tipster tells a NATO in-
telligence officer that a demonstration against a missile site
in West Germany could become violent, will American sol-
diers be sent to round up leaders of the peace movement or
ransack their offices—or worse? If an obscure political fac-
tion. or religious sect ‘‘threatens’’ to attack U.S. soldiers in
some Middle Eastern country, will Phantoms be dispatched to
bomb the nearest targets of opportunity? or the capital of
an unfriendly country? If the uncontrollable leader of a hos-
tile regime brags that he will crush the American devils, will
he find cyanide in his soup or itchy powder in his caftan?
A White House source told reporters that Reagan would
honor his 1981 executive order prohibiting U.S. government
officials from carrying out assassinations, but what about
attempts by agents of American clients and proxies? Israel's
Mossad, South Korea’s K.C.1.A., Chile’s DINA and the
Salvadoran death squads are all funded and supplied direct-
ly or indirectly by the United States, and all are adept at
capers that Reagan might find distasteful.
What constitutes an international terrorist act, after all?
And when does it threaten American interests? A bomb in
an ambassador’s automobile may be a clear-cut case of ter-
rorism, but an attack by a guerrilla army against a U.S.
military mission is an act of war. Salvadoran officials call
the rebel forces arrayed against them terrorists, the same
name Israeli leaders give to their Palestinian foes. One
SPECIAL EDITION -- TERRORISM -- 26 JUNE 1984
28 April 1984
man’s terrorist is another’s freedom fighter.
The fact is that Reagan’s order will give the legitimacy of
policy to activities that are already on the menu of subter-
fuge and secrecy. It will not stop terrorism, for if ever a pro-
gram was part of the problem rather than the solution, this:
is it. State-sanctioned terrorism creates the climate of
violence in which freelance terrorism thrives. The brutality
in El Salvador, the massacre of peasants in Guatemala, the
occupation of the West Bank—such strategies make the
responses they provoke seem feeble by comparison. Direc-
tive 138 dodges that issue, and profoundly misses the point.
Like Directive 138, the 1976 resolutions creating Con-
gressional Intelligence Committees were supposed to legiti-
mize secret U.S, operations by making them into publicly
scrutinized and sanctioned policy. But while Reagan’s ex-
ecutive order is deceptive from the start, the resolutions
were passed with the best liberal intentions of averting na-
tional moral and political disasters. Unfortunately, in just
a few years the oversight function of those committees has
eroded, and they mostly ratify and mediate the activities
they ought to prohibit.
The betrayal of the Intelligence Committees’ Origins
makes Daniel Patrick Moynihan’s resignation from -the
vice-chairmanship of the Senate Intelligence Committee a
futile gesture. The Senator says that the C.I.A.’s delay in
notifying the committee of the mining of Nicaraguan ports
destroyed the necessary trust between his panel and the
agency. But the deeper issue is Moynihan’s concept of his
duty. We do not need representatives who collaborate with
the national security apparatus; we require elected officials
who will control it.
For Moynihan, the problem with the Administration’s
Central America policy is one of communication. He has no
beef with the general proposition of a terrorist campaign
against the Sandinista government. He voted—as recently
as April 5—to give $21 million to the C.I.A. forces engaged
in murder, torture and the destruction of civilian communi-
ties in Nicaragua. He knows better than most members of
Congress that the government’s claim merely to be “‘inter-
dicting’’ men and matériel en route to El Salvador is non-
sense. An American naval flotilla in the Gulf of Fonseca
and the U.S.-Honduran military forces surely don't need
the help of the contras to do that. Moynihan just wants a
little more respect.
The Intelligence Committees of both houses could blow
the lid off Reagan’s Central America adventures if they had
a mind to, but they have not put much of a crimp in the war
effort. What have they learned about the conira seizure of
San Juan del Norte? The forces in that southern town on the
Atlantic coast are said to be made up of right-wing Cu-
ban exiles supplied with Israeli arms. No word yet from
Moynihan on that subject. Now that he’s off the committee,
he need say nothing. And that may have been the Senator’s
purpose all along.
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RQP96-00788R000100330001-5
›
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic