Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
CIA RDP81R00560R000100010001 0
Page 174
174 / 186
Approved For Release 2001/04/02 : CIA-RDP81R00560R000100010001-0
SECTION XIll
CONGRESS & THE UFOs
Copies of this report have been sent to all Members of
Congress. If you agree that the UFO subject ought to be
probed by Congress, letters to your own Congressman or
Senators would help to bring about action. We also invite the
support and encouragement of individual Members of Congress,
and will cooperate fully in any reasonable investigation which
they deem appropriate.
It is our firm conviction that the Congress is the logical
place for the UFO problem to be ironed out. Our efforts
to deal directly with the Air Force, toresolve the issue without
sensational publicity, have been rebuffed. Still, we believe the
matter can be settled in an unsensational manner without making
the Air Force a scapegoat. Air Force errors and misinforma-
tion on the UFO subject should be corrected (as should any
NICAP errors), so that the public can be reliably informed.
Beyond that, the Air Force has a serious mission to perform
and NICAP has no desire to criticize.
UFOs, we believe, are a matter for scientific inquiry. The
Air Force, through intelligence procedures, has concluded UFOs
represent no danger or threat to the national security. There-
fore, there is no reason why the scientific community should
not have complete access to UFO data and be encouraged to
study the problem from the scientific standpoint. The fact that
NICAP (including a large number of scientists and engineers)
disagrees with the Air Force about the nature of UFOs should
not be construed as an ‘‘attack’’ on the Air Force. Only
dispassionate scientific investigation can settle the dispute about
the significance of UFOs.
NICAP’s criticisms of the Air Force are directed only at
its specific policies on the UFO subject; particularly its dog-
matic and ‘‘authoritative’’ approach to the subject, and seeming
resentment of legitimate requests for more detailed data which
would allow independent study of the phenomenon.
Soon after NICAP was formed in late 1956, one of the main
goals established was to press for Congressional hearings as a
step toward bringing scientific attention to UFOs. Hearings, it
was felt, would clarify the problem and bring out information
about the scope and seriousness of the phenomenon. Hoaxters
would be exposed, and serious fact separated from misinformation.
Then it would be possible for scientists and others to lend their
skills to a thorough investigation, without fear of ridicule. An
equally important result would be a more regular flow of reliable
_ information to the public.
At first, there was only scatteredinterest in UFOs among Mem-
bers of Congress. As NICAP began to publish solid information,
sending occasional reports to Congress, interest pickedup. NICAP
members also began to write their Senators and Congressmen
urging them to look into the subject. In June 1960, NICAP sent
a confidential report to Members of Congress outlining the ac-
cumulated evidence. Congressional interest reached a peak in
1961, when the House Committee on Science & Astronautics
began to look into the matter.
Serious discussion of UFO hearings continued until, late in the
year, Chairman Overton Brooks died. About the same time,
NICAP had nearly exhausted its financial resources (always
slim), and was forced to sendan emergency appeal to its members.
The response was excellent, but it was too late to allow effective
use to continue the drive for hearings.
A misunderstanding with the Chairman ofthe UFO Subcommittee
about Congressional protocol, at the peak of interest, also was a
setback. However, the misunderstanding was cleared up and the
Subcommittee Chairman was willing to proceed with hearings,
if approved by the new parent committee Chairman. The new
Space Committee Chairman opposed UFO hearings.
Then, in answer to letters about UFOs, the House Science &
Astronautics Committee began stating that the subject was not in
their jurisdiction, referring inquiries to the House Armed
Services Committee. The Chairman of that Committee also
opposed UFO hearings.
Since early 1962, neither Committee has taken any action on
UFOs. However, interest has been shown by individual Members
of Congress, including an increasing number of Senators. The
problem has been to find an appropriate Committee Chairman who
is willing to undertake an investigation. At the present time, it
appears that the Senate Committees on Space andArmed Services
offer the best chance, although interest could also be revived in
the House Committee.
Chronological List of Statements
by Members of Congress
(From letters to NICAP members; copies on file at NICAP)
1957
Senator Barry Goldwater (R. Ariz.) - August 31, 1957
“I am an Air Force Reserve Officer and have been one for the
past 27 years and, consequently, I am, indeed, interested in un-
identified flying objects. I, frankly, feel thatthere is a great deal
to this and I have discussed it often with many Air Force Of-
ficers. . .”’
1958
Congressman William H. Ayres (R. Ohio) - January 28, 1958
“‘Congressional investigations have been held and are still be-
ing held on the problem of unidentified flying objects and the
problem is one in which there is quite a bit of interest. . .Since
most of the material presented to the Committees is classified,
the hearings are never printed. When conclusions are reached
they will be released if possible. . .’’
Congressman Ralph J. Scott (D. N.C.) - March 13, 1958
“I quite agree with you that the general public should be allowed
information thus far known about Flying Objects except, of course,
in the case where they might become unduly alarmed or panicked
by such a revelation. . .you can readily understand and appreciate
the seriousness of such a reaction. If this information could be
presented to the American public in such a way as to appeal to
reason and not to emotion, I think it would be a good thing. . .”’
Senator George Smathers (D. Fla.) - June 26, 1958
“The subject of flying saucers is one in which we all share a
great interest. No legislation is pending in the Congress at the
present time to require that information on the subject be made
public, but you may be sure that your interest in the matter will
have my attention should it come before the Senate. . .’’
Congressman Thomas Ludlow Ashley (D. Ohio) - July 14, 1958
“T have made a number of inquiries of the Air Force relative
to its activities in connection with these unidentified flying objects,
but have invariably received comment that evidence to date is too
inconclusive to sustain any theory but that these objects are
‘hoaxes, hallucinations, or normal meteorological manifestations.’
I share your concern over the secrecy that continues to shroud
our intelligence activities on this subject, and I am in complete
agreement with you that our greatest national need at this time is
the dissemination of accurate information upon which responsible
public opinion can be formulated. . .’’
Approved For Release 2001/04/02:3CIA-RDP81R00560R000100010001-0
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic