◆ SpookStack

Approved For Release 2001/04/02 : CIA- 8 PP The Killian C Case RPE SAR? wittiamsport ~~ ~ Lockhaven —<pitsburgh eJohnstown.- - PENNA: OHIO O FEBRUARY 24, 1959 | AMERICAN & UNITED ALRLINES mK Dotted lines are flight paths of Capt. Peter Killian (top), Capt. A.D. Yates (bottom). Arrows show lines of sight. I Shaded area jis hypothetical path of UFOs. 1. 8:20 p.m. First sighting by Capt. Killian. 2. 8:40 p.m, First sighting by Capt. Yates. 3. 8:55 p.m. Simultaneous sighting by Capt. Killian, two other American Airlines planes. 4. Abt. 9:00 p.m. Point where UFOs crossed in front of Capt. Yates, headed northwest. 5+ 9315 p.m. Ground observers sighted three UFOs headed west. Capt. Peter Killian, American Airlines pilot, was one of several pilots who reported observing three UFOs above Pennsylvania, Feb. 24, 1959. [See Section V]. While travelling westward across the state, Capt. Killian and the other pilots saw the UFOs flying a parallel course to the south. The Air Force later stated that the pilots had seen Air Force bombers refueling from a tanker aircraft. Reconstructing the sighting (see map), it is possible to trace a hypothetical, but very consistent, picture of the UFOs’ flight path. Around 8:20 to 8:40 p.m., from Central Pennsylvania, the UFOs were observed to the SSW paralleling the westerly course of the airliners. Their distance, of course, is unknown. But based on subsequent observations, it is a reasonable supposition that the UFOs were over southern Pennsylvania, in the vicinity of Pittsburgh and Johnstown. Around the same time that Capt. A. D, Yates, United Airlines, saw the UFOs turn and head northwest in the vicinity of Akron, three American Airlines pilots simultaneously saw the objects (8:55 p.m.), Their lines of sight converge on the Cleveland- Akron area. By 9:20 p.m., the Akron UFO Research Committee had received reports from ground observers, describing three UFOs headed west. Capt. Killian continued to observe the UFOs until he began his landing approach at Detroit, about 120 miles northwest of Akron. In a letter to Senator Harry Flood Byrd, dated 6 May 1959, Maj. Gen. W. P. Fisher (Air Force Director of Legislative Lia- ison) stated: “The investigation of this incident revealed that an Air Force refueling mission, involving a KC-97 and three B-47 aircraft, was flown in the vicinity of Bradford, Pennsylvania, at the time of the sighting by Capt. Killian. The refueling operation was con- ducted at 17,000 feet altitude at approximately 230 knots true air speed (about 265 mph) for a period of approximately one hour.” Assuming that this is a completely accurate statement, the Air Force could lay to rest this ‘‘flying saucer’’ report once and for all by publishing the exact flight plan of the refueling mission. Surely, at this late date there would be no compromising of se- curity. On the surface, the explanation is plausible (except for the back-and-forth motion of the third UFO in line), The distance from the area of Johnstown, Pa., to Detroit is approximately 250 miles, which is consistent with the distance that would be covered by the refueling tanker. On closer analysis, however, there are several discrepancies in this explanation: Q560R000100010001-0 99 ., given as a geographical reference point for the refueling mission, is north of the flight paths of the American and United airliners. All the pilots saw the UFOs to the south. If the refueling mission actually took place over southern Pennsylvania (which would have to be the case to account for the reported facts), why wasn’t Pittsburgh or Johnstown given as a reference point? Bradford is virtually the full width of the state away from the apparent location of the UFOs. (2) Triangulation shows that (from the line of Capt. Killian’s flight path in Central Pennsylvania) the tanker and other aircraft would have to be within 12 miles of Capt. Killian’s position for a sighting angle of 15 degrees to place them at approximately 17,000 feet altitude. Even allowing for a 1/3 error in estimation of angle, the aircraft would have tobe within 20 miles to the south of Capt. Killian. This is inconsistent with the observation by Capt. Yates, farther to the south, who also saw the UFOs to his south as he travelled all the way tothe Pennsylvania-Ohio border. (3) Triangulation of the simultaneous sighting by the three American Airlines pilots is even more damaging to the tanker explanation. The three lines of sight converge on the general Akron area, where ground sightings also tend to confirm the distance from Capt. Killian’s aircraft. From the position of Capt. Killian’s plane at the time of the simultaneous observation, the distance to Akron is approximately 70 miles. x | tan 15 degrees= 70 x = 70 tan 15 degrees x = 18.1 miles x = 95,568 feet (altitude of UFOs) Even allowing for a 2/3 error in angle estimation: x = 70 tan 5 degrees x = 6.1 miles x = 32,208 feet (altitude of UFOs) (4) The American Airlines pilots checked after landing and learned that no jet tankers were in thearea. (Taped statement by copilot on file at CSI, New York). Capt. Killian is also quoted by the Air Force as stating that a check with Air Traffic Control showed no three aircraft in the area (see below). (5) Several aspects of the Air Force handling of this case suggest a desire to explain it away, including issuance of typical counter-to-fact explanations. Before any representatives of the Air Force contacted Capt. Killian to obtain his report, the Air Force first suggested he had been fooled by the belt of the constellation Orion seen through breaks in the overcast. (There was noovercast). This statement was issued from ATIC three days after the sighting. An anonymous spokesman implied that UFO witnesses often proved to be drunks (N.Y. Herald-Tribune; March 1, 1959). On March 20 (more than three weeks after the sighting) the Air Force issued a statement from Washington alleging that the airline pilots had seen a refueling mission. (One critic of the USAF UFO investigation wryly suggested to NICAP that it took the Air Force three weeks to locate some of its own planes), The refueling mission explanation has since been given all inquiring Members of Congress. When contacted by the press about the tanker explanation, Capt. Killian gave a strong rebuttal: ‘‘If the Air Force wants to believe that, it can,’’ Capt. Killian said. ‘‘But I know what a B-47 looks like and I know what a KC-97 tanker looks like, and I know what they look like in operation at night. And that’s not what I saw.’’ [See Notes, Section V] Later, the Air Force began circulating a copy of a statement (unsigned) which it alleges was obtained from Capt. Killian by American Airlines: Approved For Release 2001/04/02 : G@1A-RDP81R00560R000100010001-0